Teams

1 Acac Carman/ Hall

2023 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 8.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule15 played
2023-11-18vs 8 Avalon GreenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesErin Waters / Majd Babik vs Olga Sukhova / David Israel5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNathan Arland / Heather Colberg vs Byron Holmes / Kristin Tetterton1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesLogan Gruhl / Sonya Carman vs Elizabeth Wallace / Don Busick6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErin Waters / Majd Babik vs Jay Nelson / Marcy Kozlowski7-6, 6-1
2023-11-11vs 6 TDC HallWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Waters / Majd Babik vs Irina Schaffernoth / Chapin Jones6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNicole Marks / Stuart Fulcher vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-04vs 4 Westwood Napier/KellyWon 10
W#1 DoublesKarolyn Hall / Majd Babik vs Elizabeth Kelly / Charles Wayland6-2, 7-6
2023-10-29vs 2 MAC Snow 8.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesKarolyn Hall / Christopher Chandler vs John Bennett / Delaney Rhodus6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLogan Gruhl / Sonya Carman vs Chuck Snow / Debbie Messmer6-2, 6-2
2023-10-28vs 10 Belmont EarleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLogan Gruhl / Sonya Carman vs Stacy Lukanuski / Tommy Doyle6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNathan Arland / Julie Ruth vs Edward Yesbeck / Crystal May6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-10-21vs 11 Salisbury BaderWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarolyn Hall / Christopher Chandler vs Richard Lloyd / Maren Riehm6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesErin Waters / Majd Babik vs David Voth / Megan Shrestha6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNicole Marks / Stuart Fulcher vs Radhika Thorn / Christopher Corts6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-10-20vs 3 MRTC Williams/ArnoldWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Ruth / Nathan Arland vs Stacey Johnson / Eric Spivack6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSonya Carman / Logan Gruhl vs Edgar Dearth / Denise Terrell6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesErin Waters / Majd Babik vs Emily Edens / Wayne Motley6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2023-10-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesJoanna Pfluger / Stuart Fulcher vs Doug Bond / Nina Sjogren6-3, 6-4
2023-10-08vs 2 MAC Snow 8.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesLindsey Genter / Logan Gruhl vs Ryan Berry / Kim Alley6-4, 6-3
2023-10-07vs 7 ACAC DelisioWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Waters / Majd Babik vs Joyce Steed / Michael Hollomon6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Ruth / Nathan Arland vs Victoria Bradt / Keith Adams6-1, 6-2
2023-10-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Lafors / Stuart Fulcher vs Mary Napier / Logan Gruhl4-6, 4-6
2023-10-01vs 5 Burkwood McKelvey/ColginSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLogan Gruhl / Sonya Carman vs Blake Goldsmith / Chris Gillam6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNicole Marks / Stuart Fulcher vs Keith Harvey / Robin Tyler0-6, 2-6
2023-09-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoanna Pfluger / Stuart Fulcher vs Logan Gruhl / Mary Napier6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2023-09-17vs 2 MAC Snow 8.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesLogan Gruhl / Nina Sorkin vs Ryan Berry / Kim Alley7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Laura Lafors vs Clara Laing / Seth Feibelman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Logan Gruhl
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.37
Karolyn Hall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
4.16
Erin Waters
published
4.12
Stuart Fulcher
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.98
Nathan Arland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.87
Majd Babik
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.72
Sonya Carman
published
3.45
Heather Colberg
published 4
Julie Ruth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karolyn Hall + Stuart Fulcher5550% gamesnot enough data
Majd Babik + Heather Colberg5448% gamesnot enough data
Stuart Fulcher + Heather Colberg4167% gamesnot enough data
Karolyn Hall + Nathan Arland134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Logan Gruhl
189W–40L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Karolyn Hall
120W–68L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
4.37
Erin Waters
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Stuart Fulcher
149W–170L career · 7 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Nathan Arland
82W–79L career · 4 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Majd Babik
202W–105L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.87
Sonya Carman
20W–16L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Heather Colberg
114W–88L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.45
Julie Ruth
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.