← Teams

WHRC-Adcock/Thayer

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.93 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Claire Thayer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Sally Murdoch
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.64
Chizuru Watanabe
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Rebecca Jones
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.50
Sue Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.50
Judith Kobin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.45
Dalika Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2020-02-29Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesErin Davis / Judith Kobin vs Amy Bucher / Chanon Ogden4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRebecca Jones vs Sarah Ferrer6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKay Dobashi / Chizuru Watanabe vs Autumn Gray / Sankavi Subbiah6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKyoko Adcock / Sue Harrison vs Jennifer Tran / Amanda Wiley6-2, 6-2
2020-02-15Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesClaire Thayer / Dalika Crawford vs Naomi Steinberg / Linda Binns6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRebecca Jones vs Queenie Hapke6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSally Murdoch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesErin Davis / Sue Harrison vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-02-02Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJudith Kobin / Kim Regalado vs Susan Ford / Julie Hansen6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRebecca Jones vs Kristin Spear6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSally Murdoch vs Irena Ilcheva6-2, 6-4
2020-01-26Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesKyoko Adcock / Claire Thayer vs Jennifer Tran / Sammy Bui6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRebecca Jones vs Amy Bucher6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Briggs / Sue Harrison vs Sankavi Subbiah / Jennifer Witty6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJudith Kobin / Kim Regalado vs Sarah Ferrer / Tarynn Berkman7-6, 6-4
2020-01-17Lost 2–3
W#1 DoublesClaire Thayer / Carol Briggs vs Rie Sasakawa / Rachel Karlin7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRebecca Jones vs Zhi George6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudith Kobin / Kim Regalado vs Flor Harrigan / Kelly Mohr6-0, 7-6
L#2 SinglesSally Murdoch vs Hong Jones6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKyoko Adcock / Chizuru Watanabe vs Angie Urrutia / Shamarra Jackson6-4, 6-4
2020-01-12Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSue Harrison / Carol Briggs vs Amy Graham / Babette Zielinski2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRebecca Jones vs Mary Hlady6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesClaire Thayer / Dalika Crawford vs Nancy Korenek-Leveque / Elizabeth Layton6-1, 6-1
2020-01-05Won 5–0
W#1 DoublesKyoko Adcock / Chizuru Watanabe vs Susan Ford / Kristin Spear6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRebecca Jones vs Irena Ilcheva6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnne Fahlbusch / Claire Thayer vs Teresa Sullivan / Kristie Leake6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSally Murdoch vs Leonor Diaz del Castillo6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSue Harrison / Kim Regalado vs Cathy Gatzke / Carla Wheeler6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Claire Thayer
136W–67L career
0%98%2%
3.84
4
Sally Murdoch
42W–35L career · type M
5%93%2%
3.75
4
Chizuru Watanabe
65W–48L career
7%93%0%
3.64
4
Rebecca Jones
65W–61L career
6%94%0%
3.64
4
Sue Harrison
49W–37L career
34%66%0%
3.50
4
Judith Kobin
90W–95L career
34%66%0%
3.50
3.5
Dalika Crawford
60W–40L career
0%89%11%
3.45

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.