Teams

Baden

2025 FW Combo Tournament · 8.5 Ladies

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-24vs Needs SetsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Smith / Alyssa Bauer vs Heather Vik / Brooke Cabianca6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMeredith Weckel / Kayleigh Holt vs Eleonor Belanger / Kate VandeBerghe6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCaroline Baden / Susan Huber vs Karin Fisher / Erin Piel3-6, 2-6
2025-05-24vs AlbusWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlyssa Bauer / Katherine Smith vs Teresa Albus / Tara Morgan6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRyoko Suzuki / Susan Huber vs Mariajose Alvarez / Kerry Schonwald1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKayleigh Holt / Edith Kruckmann vs Kimberly Grogan / Elise Jeffery6-3, 6-1
2025-05-23vs ApostleWon 21
L#1 DoublesCaroline Baden / Meredith Weckel vs Erin Davis / Julie Smith4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKayleigh Holt / Kay Lewis vs Sandy Beasley / Lori Russo7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRyoko Suzuki / Enya He vs Paulina Obreque Bucarey / Janet Apostle6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Alyssa Bauer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Kayleigh Holt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.99
Ryoko Suzuki
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.97
Caroline Baden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.85
Edith Kruckmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Enya He
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Kay Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Susan Huber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Meredith Weckel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryoko Suzuki + Edith Kruckmann314 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Baden + Kayleigh Holt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alyssa Bauer
31W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
4.35
Kayleigh Holt
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
Ryoko Suzuki
23W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
4.5
Caroline Baden
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
Edith Kruckmann
41W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Enya He
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Kay Lewis
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
Susan Huber
15W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Meredith Weckel
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.