Teams

VuDoo Squad

2025 Hampton Roads Combo Mixed · Hampton Roads Combo Mixed 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-11-18vs Van Daniker - Nothing but LoveLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Dimaya / Stephanie Granger vs Tommy VanDaniker / Claire Walters5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRonald Nave / Sheryl Harris vs Michael Erguiza / Johanna Pilapil6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesFranklyn Collins / Marie Nave vs Courtney Violette / Adam Newman3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Elvie Sellers
published 4.5
3.82
Cheng Tung
published 4.5
3.80
Rogelio Valdez
published
3.74
Franklyn Collins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Sheryl Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Vinita Folck
published
3.58
Stephanie Granger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Christopher Dimaya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Marie Nave
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Jackie Vu
published 3.5
3.30
Shielito Riodique
published
2.85
Carl Apelizan
published 2.5
Jeff Griffith
published
Ronald Nave
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Griffith + Jackie Vu404 matchesnot enough data
Ronald Nave + Marie Nave404 matchesnot enough data
Ronald Nave + Shielito Riodique303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elvie Sellers
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Cheng Tung
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.82
Rogelio Valdez
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Franklyn Collins
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
Sheryl Harris
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.65
Vinita Folck
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.63
Stephanie Granger
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Christopher Dimaya
14W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Marie Nave
16W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Jackie Vu
6W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Shielito Riodique
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
2.5
Carl Apelizan
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.85
Jeff Griffith
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronald Nave
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.