Teams

Griffith/West

2026 Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over Summer · Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over Summer 6.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.90 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-29vs CappelloLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Connors-Tadros / Laurie Selby vs Sabra Szczyglowski / Donna Jones3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Teresa McKeever vs Rebecca Pugh / Joy Epstein1-6, 1-6
2026-07-14vs CappelloWon 30
W#1 DoublesVictoria Ehly / Michelle O'Brien vs Marianne Becker / Donna Jones2-6, 6-5
W#2 DoublesLaurie Selby / Rosemary Harty vs Joy Epstein / Rebecca Pugh7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Teresa McKeever vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-09vs CappelloWon 20
W#2 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Victoria Ehly vs Gina Dubbe / Frances Gamble6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTerri Windsor / Cassandra West vs Marianne Becker / Rebecca Pugh6-2, 6-3
2026-07-08vs CappelloWon 30
W#1 DoublesRosemary Harty / Victoria Ehly vs Donna Jones / Joy Epstein6-3, 5-3
W#2 DoublesCassandra West / Terri Windsor vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa McKeever / Michelle O'Brien vs Jane Diepenbrock / Frances Gamble7-6, 6-1
2026-06-17vs CappelloLost 12
W#1 DoublesCassandra West / Terri Windsor vs Sabra Szczyglowski / Donna Jones6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVictoria Ehly / Teresa McKeever vs Rebecca Pugh / Joy Epstein7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle O'Brien / Rosemary Harty vs Judith Cappello / Marianne Becker4-6, 0-6
2026-06-09vs CappelloWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle O'Brien / Terri Windsor vs Jane Diepenbrock / Jodee Hechler1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRosemary Harty / Laurie Selby vs Patricia Murphy / Sabra Szczyglowski3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Teresa McKeever vs Marianne Becker / Judith Cappello3-6, 2-6
2026-06-03vs CappelloLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle O'Brien / Cassandra West vs Joy Epstein / Rebecca Pugh6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTeresa McKeever / Victoria Ehly vs Sabra Szczyglowski / Patricia Murphy2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Laurie Selby vs Jane Diepenbrock / Jodee Hechler5-7, 4-6
2026-05-20vs CappelloLost 03
L#1 DoublesCassandra West / Victoria Ehly vs Sabra Szczyglowski / Donna Jones2-6, 4-4
L#2 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Terri Windsor vs Rebecca Pugh / Joy Epstein3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLori Connors-Tadros / Laurie Selby vs Jodee Hechler / Frances Gamble2-6, 3-6
2026-05-11vs CappelloWon 21
W#1 DoublesCassandra West / Victoria Ehly vs Joy Epstein / Rebecca Pugh6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTeresa McKeever / Laurie Selby vs Judith Cappello / Gina Dubbe1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle O'Brien / Terri Windsor vs Frances Gamble / Sabra Szczyglowski6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over Summer 6.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Griffith/West54151229235
2Cappello45121531233

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Cassandra West
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.86
Victoria Ehly
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.71
Terri Windsor
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Rosemary Harty
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.52
Laurie Selby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.32
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.21
Lori Connors-Tadros
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Teresa McKeever
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Ehly + Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne213 matchesnot enough data
Cassandra West + Terri Windsor303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cassandra West
64W–68L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Victoria Ehly
32W–46L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Terri Windsor
140W–125L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Rosemary Harty
68W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
Laurie Selby
12W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%44%56%
2.52
2.5
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne
39W–85L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
Lori Connors-Tadros
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.21
Teresa McKeever
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.