Teams

SD 4.0 Mtn View/ Reyes (3:2)

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Men - 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-12vs SD LLW 4.0 Mountain View/ GalanWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarc Channick / Bob Ruane vs John Carter / Kenny Hawkins6-4, 7-5
2022-06-05vs SD 4.0 Lake Murray TC/ Hill (3:2)Split 11
W#2 DoublesScott Atwood / Marc Channick vs Seth Hill / Edward Grader6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesChris Chang / Albert Alagata vs Andrew Gilcrest / Scott Rath3-6, 1-6
2022-05-22vs SD 4.0 Coronado TC/ Penn (3:2)Won 20
W#2 SinglesAlbert Alagata vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarc Channick / Bob Ruane vs John Torres / Joe Economou6-3, 6-1
2022-05-15vs SD 4.0 Mtn View/ Loventhal (3:2)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMarc Channick / Anthony Reyes vs Eric Bowers / PIERRE CHATELAIN6-2, 6-4
2022-05-08vs SD LLW 4.0 Mountain View/ GalanLost 01
L#2 DoublesScott Atwood / Marc Channick vs Jed Galan / Steven Lee - (DQ)*3-6, 3-6
2022-05-01vs SD 4.0 Lake Murray TC/ Hill (3:2)Won 21
W#1 DoublesBob Ruane / Scott Atwood vs M Edelson / Jess Zlotnik5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMarc Channick vs Serge Glaeser0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLorenzo Herrera / Albert Alagata vs Seth Hill / Andrew Gilcrest6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-24vs SD 4.0 Coronado TC/ Penn (3:2)Won 21
W#2 DoublesScott Atwood / Bob Ruane vs Kim Ostermarker / Christopher Penn6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAlbert Alagata vs Michael Kamas1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarc Channick / Bradley Shapiro vs Adam Hoch / Myles Huck6-3, 7-5
2022-04-03vs SD 4.0 Mtn View/ Loventhal (3:2)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMarc Channick / Colin Chang vs Corey Somers / Mark Bauer6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Marc Channick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.86
Scott Atwood
published
3.76
Albert Alagata
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Bob Ruane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Colin Chang
published 4
Lorenzo Herrera
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bob Ruane + Marc Channick8261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marc Channick
202W–81L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
4.01
Scott Atwood
18W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Albert Alagata
30W–18L career · type M · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Bob Ruane
55W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Colin Chang
1W–11L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
Lorenzo Herrera
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.