Teams

LFW:Wayland:Jordan

2026 EMA Adult 65 & Over Men · 7.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-13vs LFNT:Natick:PintoLost 02
L#1 DoublesDan Rorabaugh / Ray Camphausen vs Scott Heide / Jeff Jacobson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRoger Racine / Gerhard Koenig vs Jonathan Bower / Michael Blau2-6, 2-6
2026-07-07vs LFNT:Natick:PintoLost 03
L#1 DoublesDan Rorabaugh / Ray Camphausen vs Jeff Jacobson / James Bryant0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDidier Boutet / Tony Ip vs James Erdekian / Pedro Garbes6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRoger Racine / Gerhard Koenig vs Scott Heide / Neil Goldberg3-6, 1-6
2026-07-01vs LFNT:Natick:PintoLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Jordan / Craig Newfield vs Andrzej Niemierko / Jonathan Bower0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRandy Johnson / Mark Schneider vs James Erdekian / Neil Goldberg2-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesTony Ip / Ted Shea vs Ralph Pinto / Rich Kosowsky3-6, 2-6
2026-06-24vs LFNT:Natick:PintoLost 03
L#1 DoublesRandy Johnson / Mark Jordan vs Jonathan Bower / Scott Heide0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Newfield / Mark Schneider vs James Bryant / Rich Kosowsky3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDeepak Taneja / Tony Ip vs James Erdekian / Michael Blau5-7, 2-6
2026-05-30vs LFNT:Natick:PintoLost 03
L#1 DoublesRoger Racine / Tony Ip vs Rich Kosowsky / Andrzej Niemierko1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Schauer / Ted Shea vs William Willis / Neil Goldberg6-7, 2-3
L#3 DoublesGerhard Koenig / Dan Rorabaugh vs Michael Blau / Richard Stoppe0-6, 0-6
2026-05-23vs LFNT:Natick:PintoLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Jordan / Craig Newfield vs Pedro Garbes / William Willis3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTony Ip / Ted Shea vs Michael Blau / Richard Stoppe4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LFNT:Natick:Pinto06171486
2LFW:Wayland:Jordan0611734199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Deepak Taneja
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Didier Boutet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Craig Newfield
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Dan Rorabaugh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Gerhard Koenig
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ray Camphausen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roger Racine
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Schauer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ted Shea
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tony Ip
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deepak Taneja
1W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Didier Boutet
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Craig Newfield
0W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.91
3.5
Dan Rorabaugh
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
Gerhard Koenig
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Jordan
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Schneider
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Randy Johnson
18W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ray Camphausen
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roger Racine
2W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve Schauer
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Ted Shea
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tony Ip
8W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.