Teams

Cincy Garcia

2026 OH OV SUMMER A18&O M Cincinnati · 2026 Summer A 18&O 4.5M Cincinnati

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs Cincy NortheyWon 31
W#1 DoublesMason Bourbon / Regis Liou vs Ronnen Isakov / Nicholas Elleman6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKassidy Kase vs Ryan Hagemeier4-4
W#2 DoublesAlexander Kang / Daniel Starczynowski vs Ryan Cunningham / Nicholas Mcnamee6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMicah Garcia vs Donald Speeg6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-07Won 21
W#1 DoublesCristiano Trojani / Edward Mueller vs Donald Speeg / Clayton Northey6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMicah Garcia vs Ryan Hagemeier4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRegis Liou / Keenen Lambert vs Ryan Cunningham / Nicholas Mcnamee6-3, 6-3
2026-06-30vs Cincy NortheyWon 21
W#1 DoublesCristiano Trojani / Ian Deiters vs Ronnen Isakov / Ryan Hagemeier6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJohn van Lokeren / Bradley Tash vs Ryan Cunningham / Nicholas Mcnamee6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKeenen Lambert vs Donald Speeg4-6, 0-6
2026-06-23vs Cincy NortheyWon 31
W#1 DoublesRegis Liou / Eric MacLin vs Ryan Hagemeier / Nicholas Elleman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMicah Garcia vs Clayton Northey6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBradley Tash / Daniel Starczynowski vs Jay Woffington / Ryan Cunningham6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesDrew Barzman vs Donald Speeg3-6, 4-6
2026-06-16vs Cincy NortheyWon 41
W#1 DoublesTakuro Yamamoto / Edward Mueller vs Donald Speeg / Ryan Hagemeier6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKassidy Kase vs Clayton Northey6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn van Lokeren / Mason Bourbon vs Drew Lovell / Nicholas Elleman6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKeenen Lambert vs Adam Bercz2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAlexander Kang / Regis Liou vs Mike Bolander / Ronnen Isakov6-1, 6-4
2026-06-09vs Cincy NortheySplit 11
L#1 DoublesKeenen Lambert / Daniel Starczynowski vs Mike Bolander / Ronnen Isakov5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEdward Mueller vs Adam Bercz6-2, 6-4
2026-06-02vs Cincy NortheyWon 32
W#1 DoublesTakuro Yamamoto / Cristiano Trojani vs Donald Speeg / Ryan Hagemeier6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBradley Tash vs Adam Bercz5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAlexander Kang / Mason Bourbon vs Joseph Patten / Gavin Isakov7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKassidy Kase vs Grady Roeper6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJohn van Lokeren / Keenen Lambert vs Ronnen Isakov / Jay Woffington5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 Summer A 18&O 4.5M Cincinnati
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cincy Garcia7026922226
2Cincy Northey0792654374

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Kassidy Kase
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.50
Cristiano Trojani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.46
Edward Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.41
Micah Garcia
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.37
Regis Liou
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.34
Ian Deiters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Drew Barzman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Daniel Starczynowski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Keenen Lambert
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.15
Bradley Tash
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
John van Lokeren
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.14
Alexander Kang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Eric MacLin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Takuro Yamamoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexander Kang + Regis Liou3347% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kassidy Kase
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
4.52
4.5
Cristiano Trojani
15W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.50
4.5
Edward Mueller
11W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
4.46
Micah Garcia
19W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.41
Regis Liou
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Ian Deiters
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Drew Barzman
24W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Daniel Starczynowski
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22
Keenen Lambert
42W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Bradley Tash
33W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
4.15
John van Lokeren
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Alexander Kang
22W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Eric MacLin
16W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
23%76%<1%
4.09
Takuro Yamamoto
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.