Teams

TIBURON PEN C CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-31vs PIONEER PK CW6.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Patel / Melissa Feagin vs Bernadette McCarthy / Dominique Audet6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTina Davis / Adriana Mason vs Cheryl Egan / Karen Mangan6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJessica Etchevers / Marisa McArthur vs Florence Pattison / Sandy Geller6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Kathleen Goodhart
published
3.48
Victoria Tucker
published
3.46
Lisa Westley
published
3.43
Elaine Moore
published 3.5
3.30
Kate Wyss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Angela Webster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Melissa Feagin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Adriana Mason
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Suzanne Davenport
published
2.93
Jena Watson
published
2.92
Tina Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Victoria Treyger
published
2.86
Charlotte Will
published 3
2.86
Connie Gove
published 3
2.85
Jessica Etchevers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Kim Sichel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Abby Hoffman
published 3
2.73
Katherine Seymore
published
2.69
Marisa McArthur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
2.55
Elizabeth Cha
published 3
2.48
Shannan Bishop
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adriana Mason + Victoria Treyger4161% gamesnot enough data
Shannan Bishop + Katherine Seymore224 matchesnot enough data
Tina Davis + Jessica Etchevers314 matchesnot enough data
Abby Hoffman + Adriana Mason404 matchesnot enough data
Abby Hoffman + Suzanne Davenport314 matchesnot enough data
Tina Davis + Jena Watson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Goodhart
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Victoria Tucker
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Lisa Westley
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Elaine Moore
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
Kate Wyss
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Angela Webster
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
Melissa Feagin
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.12
3
Adriana Mason
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Suzanne Davenport
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Jena Watson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Tina Davis
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Victoria Treyger
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Charlotte Will
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Connie Gove
3W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
Jessica Etchevers
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Kim Sichel
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.83
3
Abby Hoffman
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Katherine Seymore
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Marisa McArthur
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
Kristina van Prooyen
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%32%68%
2.56
3
Elizabeth Cha
0W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Shannan Bishop
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.