Teams

B3 Westwood Gilman

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-06vs B6 Avalon GhitaWon 10
W#1 DoublesKacie Painter / Ashley Sommardahl vs Kim Johnson / Jeanne Oostdyk6-4, 6-1
2021-05-23vs B4 Woodlake LarocheWon 10
W#1 DoublesKacie Painter / Renee Gilman vs Nina Sober / Wendy Learn6-4, 6-1
2021-05-16vs B1 Raintree MassengillWon 10
W#1 DoublesRenee Gilman / Kacie Painter vs Molly Smith / Deanne Ralston7-6, 6-3
2021-05-08vs B7 MAC Bouncers BatesLost 01
L#1 DoublesKacie Painter / Christine Holt vs Linda Benson / Mary Church2-6, 6-7
2021-04-17vs B8 MRTC Battery Park Hawley/GrayWon 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Thomas / Kacie Painter vs Joy Nyman / Vera Spencer-Gray6-1, 6-2
2021-04-10vs B4 Woodlake LarocheWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Holt / Kacie Painter vs Sandra Bavaro / Virginia Patterson6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Bobbie Lou Oley
published 4
3.55
Kacie Painter
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.29
Elizabeth Keith
published 3.5
3.25
Holly Martin
published 3.5
3.20
Sarah Thomas
published
3.18
Christine Holt
published 3.5
2.97
Renee Gilman
published
2.97
Sara Sloman
published
Brooks Casey
published 3
Elizabeth O'Hare
published 3
2.66
Meghann Quinn
published
2.65
2.65
Penny Lowrey
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bobbie Lou Oley
139W–64L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
Kacie Painter
199W–63L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Elizabeth Keith
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Holly Martin
17W–13L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Sarah Thomas
9W–4L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Christine Holt
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
Renee Gilman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
2.97
Sara Sloman
16W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Brooks Casey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Elizabeth O'Hare
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Meghann Quinn
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Ashley Sommardahl
7W–8L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
Penny Lowrey
10W–26L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.