← Teams

SHC-Zielinski

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.92 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Leslie OBrien
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.67
Catherine Crosby
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.66
Toni Kidd
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.46
Nancy Korenek-Leveque
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Teresa Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Babette Zielinski
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
—
Gwen Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 0
Results7 ties
2019-06-29Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesAnita Havemann / Teresa Jackson vs Amy Alpern / Jana Corder6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBabette Zielinski / Leslie OBrien vs Cathy Porter / Jen Woods6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesToni Kidd vs Ashleigh Kayser6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCynthia Perelli-Minetti / Catherine Crosby vs Lisa Lyon / Tracy Bardell7-5
2019-06-22Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBabette Zielinski / Nancy Korenek-Leveque vs Elizabeth Lilly / Marie Reykalin3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnita Havemann / Teresa Jackson vs Alison Davis / Nancy Williams2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCatherine Crosby vs Bethany Bounds7-5, 6-3
2019-06-09Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesLeslie OBrien / Allison Reid vs Roxanne Imbrie / Kris Kelly-Koster6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCynthia Perelli-Minetti / Catherine Crosby vs Emily McBride / Patricia Sturr6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesToni Kidd vs Elaine Zevenbergen6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLeeann Talbott / Gwen Matthews vs Jil Delanty / Irene Feldun7-6, 7-5
2019-06-02Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesBabette Zielinski / Jennifer Hill vs Amy Smith / Lyndee Barrett4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Perelli-Minetti / Catherine Crosby vs Beth Steffes / Paula Watt6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesToni Kidd vs Ellen Bowman6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Jackson / Anita Havemann vs Hideko Kershaw / Angie Lee4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-06-01Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesCatherine Crosby / Cynthia Perelli-Minetti vs Heike Droste / Hideko Kershaw6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBabette Zielinski / Jennifer Hill vs Angie Lee / Cheryl Roloff4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLeslie OBrien vs Yumiko Sterling6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnita Havemann / Nancy Korenek-Leveque vs Katherine Lomartire / Paula Watt7-5, 6-2
2019-05-12Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCynthia Perelli-Minetti / Catherine Crosby vs Terrina Gonzalez / Erin Thole7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGwen Matthews / Leeann Talbott vs Jil Delanty / Patricia Sturr4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLeslie OBrien vs Kelly Bartlett6-1, 6-2
2019-05-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLeslie OBrien / Allison Reid vs Tonya Dirk / JENNIFER BELOY6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBabette Zielinski / Catherine Crosby vs Jeanne-Sarah DeLarquier / Melissa Light6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesToni Kidd vs Kelly Asbridge6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Leslie OBrien
46W–45L career
32%68%1%
3.97
4
Catherine Crosby
67W–26L career
7%93%0%
3.67
4
Toni Kidd
57W–59L career
4%96%0%
3.66
3.5
Nancy Korenek-Leveque
76W–81L career · type A
0%89%11%
3.46
4
Teresa Jackson
24W–39L career
60%40%0%
3.40
3.5
Babette Zielinski
52W–66L career
0%97%3%
3.33
0
Gwen Matthews
22W–24L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.