Teams

Cheung (Kendalltown)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Spring - Night · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.93 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-24vs Sioli (Coral Pine)Won 31
L#1 DoublesMaria Hulett / Nina Lindsey vs Alison McLaughlin / Jill Hidalgo5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLisa Simpson / Dana Hamrick vs Marianne Sioli / Jill Balli5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKathryn Paige Ciano vs Mariola Idrobo6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmanda Noboa / Debby Lichtner vs Tracey Kealy / Daria Castan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-18vs Sosa (Dante Fascell)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesMaria Hulett / Nina Lindsey vs Caroline Rinehart / Mariana DeLima-Teixeira6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKathryn Paige Ciano vs Daniela Hernandez2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Noboa / Debby Lichtner vs Myriam Alvarez Scicolone / Mabel Vela7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDana Hamrick vs Maria Ayarra3-6, 3-6
2023-03-13vs TeamForman (Riviera Prep)Split 22
L#1 DoublesNina Lindsey / Maria Hulett vs Allison Cohen / Maricarmen Diazmiron4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKathryn Paige Ciano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Noboa / Debby Lichtner vs Maira Maguire / Andrea Mientkiewicz4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Simpson / Dana Hamrick vs Mellissa Cili / Olga Grant6-2, 6-2
2023-03-06vs TEAM ALLEY CATS (Salvadore Park)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMaria Hulett / Nina Lindsey vs Catherine McManus / Dilia Grossman6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKathryn Paige Ciano vs Claudia Viso6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Simpson / Dana Hamrick vs Liliana Cronwall / Andrea Leal5-7, 2-6
2023-02-27Lost 13
W#1 DoublesLauren Miller / Maria Hulett vs Gabriela Piacentini / Maria Suarez6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKathryn Paige Ciano vs Carolina Rincon - (DQ)*6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Noboa / Debby Lichtner vs Michele King / Sandra Bacman2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesDana Hamrick vs Pauline Markowicz4-6, 3-6
2023-02-06vs Remigio (Ron Ehmann)Split 22
W#1 DoublesLisa Simpson / Maria Hulett vs Maristela Britto / Cristina Freitas6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKathryn Paige Ciano vs Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmanda Noboa / Dana Hamrick vs Dana Sanford / Carmen Alvarez6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNina Lindsey / Meredith Camel vs Morayma Remigio / Viola Lake2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-01-30vs Cerbu (Riviera Prep)Split 22
W#1 DoublesMaria Hulett / Lauren Miller vs Esther Surujon / Sanja Zivanovic6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKathryn Paige Ciano vs Ana Cerbu6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Simpson / Nina Lindsey vs Rachel Weiss / Patricia Romeu1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebby Lichtner / Dana Hamrick vs Mira Hashe / Paola Jaime4-6, 0-6
2023-01-23vs Miami-Dade/Miniet/18&over4.0WLost 23
W#1 DoublesMaria Hulett / Lisa Simpson vs Elizabeth Gonzalez / Alejandra Siller6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKathryn Paige Ciano vs Gricel Boto Bernales2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Camel / Debby Lichtner vs Leslie Stein / Elena DeVera4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesDana Hamrick vs Britta Reinhardt Moser6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNina Lindsey / Lauren Miller vs Alba Johnson / Beth Pritchett1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Maria Hulett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Kathryn Paige Ciano
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 4
3.74
Dana Hamrick
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.69
Amanda Noboa
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Lisa Simpson
published
3.47
Meredith Camel
published
3.42
Nina Lindsey
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.23
Debby Lichtner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Cristina Melendez
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Hulett + Nina Lindsey81246% games+2.1% vs expected
Amanda Noboa + Dana Hamrick8253% games+0.9% vs expected
Dana Hamrick + Lisa Simpson6449% games−2.5% vs expected
Debby Lichtner + Amanda Noboa368343% games−3.5% vs expected
Debby Lichtner + Dana Hamrick4341% games−7.1% vs expected
Cristina Melendez + Dana Hamrick12753% games−10.0% vs expected
Maria Hulett + Dana Hamrick5455% gamesnot enough data
Dana Hamrick + Nina Lindsey2441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Maria Hulett
182W–138L career · 8 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Kathryn Paige Ciano
103W–54L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Dana Hamrick
138W–156L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Amanda Noboa
109W–130L career · 5 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Lisa Simpson
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
Meredith Camel
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.47
4
Nina Lindsey
46W–75L career · 7 lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Debby Lichtner
49W–125L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Cristina Melendez
92W–82L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.