Teams

BERKELEY TC 40AW4.5A

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.5

20 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.70
Blair Paige
published 5
4.60
Kathleen Haigood
published
4.44
Sabrina Thong
published
4.30
Helen Potter
published 4.5
4.20
Fionnuala Wright
published 4.5
4.20
Heather Ruegg
published 4.5
4.12
Kate Silverness
published
4.05
Anita Kressner
published 4.5
4.05
Cynthia Abel
published 4.5
4.00
Leila Kasrovi
published
4.00
Kathy Wei
published
3.93
Marcia Banks
published
3.85
Susan Junfish
published
3.79
Jo Baker
published
Deborah Dyer
published 4
3.74
Molly Brostrom
published
3.69
Kathleen Heinze
published
3.59
Natalie Duxbury
published
3.43
Jennifer Leebove
published
Karen Spinardi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leila Kasrovi + Jo Baker3348% games−0.3% vs expected
Anita Kressner + Molly Brostrom123 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Duxbury + Deborah Dyer123 matchesnot enough data
Molly Brostrom + Kate Silverness213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Blair Paige
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.70
Kathleen Haigood
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.60
Sabrina Thong
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
4.44
4.5
Helen Potter
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Fionnuala Wright
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Heather Ruegg
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
Kate Silverness
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Anita Kressner
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
4.05
4.5
Cynthia Abel
19W–10L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
Leila Kasrovi
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00
Kathy Wei
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
4.00
Marcia Banks
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.93
Susan Junfish
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
Jo Baker
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.79
4
Deborah Dyer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Molly Brostrom
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.74
Kathleen Heinze
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Natalie Duxbury
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
Jennifer Leebove
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.43
Karen Spinardi
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.