Teams

EW-WCCP-Richey

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 MEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-11-06vs CBRC-QAFOKUWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Ryan / Richard Splichal vs Todd Samuel / Nikolla Qafoku7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Marshall / Don Ho vs John Sands / Kent Ozkardesh6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChester Richey / Dean Gray vs Emmitt Jackson / Vincent Beasley5-7, 0-6
2022-11-05vs WRAC-CusickWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Ryan / Richard Splichal vs Carlos Lacayo / Stephen Knox6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Ross / Kevin Kuhlmann vs Brad Sourbeer / Tom Rechtin7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDean Gray / Tony Rund vs Stewart Cusick / Bill Harper6-4, 6-4
2022-11-05vs YTC-ChillinDeGrasseWon 21
L#1 DoublesRichard Splichal / Robert Marshall vs Danny Mullins / James Degrasse1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDon Ho / Michael Ross vs Eric Anderson / David Whiteside6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKevin Kuhlmann / Tony Rund vs Jim Stewart / Dan Ferguson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-11-04vs EW-PTC-AnegonWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Ryan / Richard Splichal vs Jorge Pacheco / Daniel Higgins6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKevin Kuhlmann / Don Ho vs Alan Johnson / Revell Coy7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDean Gray / Chester Richey vs Steve Buckingham / Buddy Levy3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-WCCP-Richey40938112
2EW-PTC-Anegon3193681
3CBRC-QAFOKU226612105
4WRAC-Cusick134817125
5YTC-ChillinDeGrasse0421020132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Chris Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Chester Richey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dean Gray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Don Ho
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Kuhlmann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Splichal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tony Rund
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Splichal + Chris Ryan4345% gamesnot enough data
Dean Gray + Chester Richey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Ryan
50W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Chester Richey
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Dean Gray
11W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Don Ho
11W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Kuhlmann
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Splichal
12W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tony Rund
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.