Teams

A40 4.0M MV1 Mercuri

2023 NEOTA Adult 40 & Over · NEOTA A40&O 4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.94 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-24vs A40 4.0M CV WeiskindWon 50
W#1 DoublesAndrew Albrecht / Cheolwook YOON vs Tom McPhillips / Marc Groedel6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesYing Lin vs Paul Nahra6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTimothy Jones / Keith Brady vs Martin Birze / Rich Frey7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEric Mock / Justin Brock vs William Mooney / Julian Norley6-4, 6-3
W#4 DoublesMotoo Saito / Tom Flenner vs Mark Weiskind / Alexander Szilvas6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-17vs A40 4.0M WE RiesWon 50
W#1 DoublesAndrew Albrecht / Cheolwook YOON vs Patrick Tobler / Corey O'Brien6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChristopher Jarox vs Robert Siebenschuh6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTimothy Jones / Keith Brady vs Seth Unger / Karl Burtnett6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGerald King / Eric Mock vs Peter Frankfort / Ryan Niehenke6-3, 6-2
W#4 DoublesMotoo Saito / Tom Flenner vs David Barr / Ken Webster7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-26vs A40 4.0M MV2 SmithWon 40
W#1 DoublesTimothy Jones / Cheolwook YOON vs Ken Gustafson / David Cole6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesYing Lin vs Douglas Vahey6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJinu Hwang / Eric Mock vs Patrick Smith / Wei Liao6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGerald King / Tom Flenner vs Gary Fleming / Michael Falcone6-1, 6-0
2023-06-19vs A40 4.0M CRC KomoroskiWon 41
W#1 DoublesAndrew Albrecht / Timothy Jones vs Adam Sherman / Carl Tippit4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesYing Lin vs Matt Winograd7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEric Mock / Keith Brady vs Leonard Pagon / Michael Capozella6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMotoo Saito / Christopher Jarox vs Chirag Choudhary / Gary Colister6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesJinu Hwang / David Kolesar vs Jim Bright / Leonard Kichler6-4, 6-4
2023-06-12vs A40 4.0M CV WeiskindLost 23
W#1 DoublesCheolwook YOON / Timothy Jones vs Rich Frey / Julian Norley6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesYing Lin vs Egon Singerman6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJustin Brock / Keith Brady vs William Mooney / Paul Nahra6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEric Mock / Gerald King vs Mark Weiskind / Alexander Szilvas1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#4 DoublesMotoo Saito / Jinu Hwang vs Tom McPhillips / Cary Goldstein2-6, 4-6
2023-06-05vs A40 4.0M WE RiesWon 50
W#1 DoublesAndrew Albrecht / Timothy Jones vs Ken Webster / Sonny Kwon6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCheolwook YOON vs Seth Unger3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGerald King / Eric Mock vs Peter Frankfort / Ryan Niehenke6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKeith Brady / Curtis Ottens vs GAUTAM PATHAK / James Pruce6-2, 6-4
W#4 DoublesJustin Brock / David Kolesar vs Robert Siebenschuh / Peruri Srinivasulu6-3, 6-2
2023-05-15vs A40 4.0M MV2 SmithWon 41
W#1 DoublesAndrew Albrecht / Cheolwook YOON vs Preet Kang / Bruce Bensimone6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesYing Lin vs Wei Liao6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKeith Brady / Justin Brock vs David Blond / Ken Gustafson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEric Mock / Tom Flenner vs David Cole / Ryan Garst6-4, 6-4
L#4 DoublesMotoo Saito / Frank Mercuri vs Brad Gerber / Gary Fleming3-6, 2-6
2023-05-08vs A40 4.0M CRC KomoroskiWon 50
W#1 DoublesAndrew Albrecht / Timothy Jones vs Bill Babcox / Carl Tippit6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCheolwook YOON vs Leonard Komoroski6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKeith Brady / Justin Brock vs James Davin / Todd Gardiner6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGerald King / Eric Mock vs Gary Colister / Cullen Roth6-2, 6-1
W#4 DoublesMotoo Saito / Jinu Hwang vs Leonard Pagon / Jim Bright6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · NEOTA A40&O 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A40 4.0M 3 PM Tyrpak82381233373
2A40 4.0M 3 NC Otto82321843422
3A40 4.0M MV1 Mercuri7135516247
4A40 4.0M 3 WR1 Loescher73302041414
5A40 4.0M 2 PW Plymak73311946408
6A40 4.0M CV Weiskind62251539367
7A40 4.0M 2 MM Burnoski64242656446
8A40 4.0M WE Ries53202049371
9A40 4.0M MV2 Smith26122862417
10A40 4.0M 3 WR2 Mitnick28193176534
11A40 4.0M 2 BV Kozar28143679553
12A40 4.0M CRC Komoroski0883267420
13A40 4.0M 2 AO Wissman010123881525

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Ying Lin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.90
Curtis Ottens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Gerald King
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.85
Motoo Saito
usually #4 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.83
Andrew Albrecht
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Keith Brady
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Cheolwook YOON
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
Christopher Jarox
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.69
Jinu Hwang
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Eric Mock
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.51
Frank Mercuri
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
David Kolesar
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4
Justin Brock
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
Timothy Jones
published
Tom Flenner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith Brady + Justin Brock7168% games+9.3% vs expected
Eric Mock + Gerald King26364% games+8.7% vs expected
Jinu Hwang + Motoo Saito3255% games+4.0% vs expected
Frank Mercuri + David Kolesar7355% games−3.4% vs expected
Frank Mercuri + Tom Flenner7749% games−8.8% vs expected
Frank Mercuri + Christopher Jarox1440% gamesnot enough data
Frank Mercuri + Andrew Albrecht213 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Albrecht + Cheolwook YOON303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ying Lin
25W–12L career · 5 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
4.06
4
Curtis Ottens
28W–38L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Gerald King
37W–9L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
Motoo Saito
38W–15L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Andrew Albrecht
85W–57L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
Keith Brady
45W–12L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Cheolwook YOON
17W–13L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Christopher Jarox
24W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jinu Hwang
82W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Eric Mock
113W–101L career · 8 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Frank Mercuri
109W–135L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
4
David Kolesar
93W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
Justin Brock
20W–12L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Timothy Jones
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tom Flenner
15W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.