Teams

RRC Set 2 Win

2026 55&Over Women Winter · 7.0 Women Fall

17 players · average NTRP 3.27 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-15vs NRRC: Grey GooseWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanice Cavatoni / Karen Moriarty vs Karen Strating / Deborah von Glahn2-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKristen Hoft / Susan Williamson vs Betsy Mukamal / Andrea Fage6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Nask / Wendy Hyer vs Laura Buckley / Julia O'Connor6-4, 6-2
2026-02-07vs Armonk Domes: Wise AcesLost 12
W#1 DoublesNefertiti Greene / Elizabeth Johnson vs Nicole Berman / Susan Flanagan7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHelene Ginsburg / Alexandra Nicklas vs Maria-Elena Fernandez-Beros / Beth Nechamkin5-7, 5-5
L#3 DoublesLaura Frase / Wendy Hyer vs Joan Behren / Valerie Jacobs4-6, 4-6
2026-02-06vs Club Fit JV-Double TroubleWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Nicklas / Janice Cavatoni vs Patricia Sullivan / Caroline Brodie7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Williamson / Kristen Hoft vs Catherine Cousin / Kathy Goltzman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLillian Schulz / Laura Frase vs Carmen Heady / Joanna Segal2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-01-11vs Matchpoint Gracefully AcingLost 12
L#1 DoublesNefertiti Greene / Elizabeth Johnson vs Michelle Kushner / Sara Schlussel5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Frase / Kristen Hoft vs Maribel Unanue / Jody Rose-Bronner4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Mancini / Karen Moriarty vs Ji Park / Helaine Wohl1-6, 2-6
2025-12-19vs Club Fit Briarcliff- Hot FlashesLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanice Cavatoni / Kristen Hoft vs Lorraine Campo / Jennifer Sheehy4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Frase / Susan Williamson vs Cindy Greenstein / Judy Strollo7-6, 4-3
L#3 DoublesSusan Nask / Helene Ginsburg vs Liz SusmanKarp / Beth Bell3-6, 1-6
2025-12-09vs Sportime HIWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanice Cavatoni / Kristen Hoft vs Christine Durland / Joan Hiam2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHelene Ginsburg / Alexandra Nicklas vs Kathryn Pizzuto / Angelika Leissl6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Frase / Andrea Mancini vs Joanne Clark / Myrna Gardner7-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesJanice Cavatoni / Karen Moriarty vs Ellen Dumark / Jacqueline Bohan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Frase / Helene Ginsburg vs Jane Prokop / IZABELLA ALEXANDROWSKI3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Mancini / Susan Williamson vs Christine Burns / Suzanne Page1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Johnson / Alexandra Nicklas vs Kathleen DiSalvatore / Daniela Sansone5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Mancini / Lillian Schulz vs Pattison Youngren / Deborah Antoine1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesWendy Hyer / Dolores Principe Masino vs Karen Healy / Anne Young5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Wendy Hyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Janice Cavatoni
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Helene Ginsburg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristen Hoft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Susan Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Elizabeth Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Nefertiti Greene
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Alexandra Nicklas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Andrea Mancini
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Karen Moriarty
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Laura Frase
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Lillian Schulz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Susan Nask
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.27
Dolores Principe Masino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Karen Collins
published
Michiyo Terakado
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Frase + Kristen Hoft7356% games+14.1% vs expected
Wendy Hyer + Lillian Schulz5065% games+9.8% vs expected
Laura Frase + Karen Moriarty7255% games+7.5% vs expected
Karen Moriarty + Susan Nask2547% games+6.9% vs expected
Karen Collins + Andrea Mancini13265% games+4.2% vs expected
Dolores Principe Masino + Karen Moriarty9165% games+4.2% vs expected
Laura Frase + Lillian Schulz15555% games+3.5% vs expected
Amanda Cornacchia + Karen Moriarty6258% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Wendy Hyer
196W–154L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
Janice Cavatoni
227W–104L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Helene Ginsburg
82W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Kristen Hoft
113W–79L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Susan Williamson
66W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Elizabeth Johnson
54W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.11
Nefertiti Greene
30W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Alexandra Nicklas
93W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Andrea Mancini
155W–124L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Karen Moriarty
181W–179L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Laura Frase
140W–117L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Lillian Schulz
122W–89L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Susan Nask
92W–91L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Amanda Cornacchia
63W–41L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Dolores Principe Masino
146W–140L career · 1 line in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
Karen Collins
29W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michiyo Terakado
46W–37L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.