Teams

CP:Double Trouble:Erlenkotter

2025 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women - Day · 6.0 55 & Over Women 1

14 players · average NTRP 3.08 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-01-31vs 4S:Honey Deuces:Conklin/HaddadWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlicia Cintron / Cindy Lannon vs Tracy Haddad / Paula Park6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPatricia Coomaraswamy / Monica Lynn vs Christine Gaspar / Marie Lima1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesDawn Jackson / Daniela Sansone vs Michele Logan / Susan Tibbetts4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Carroll / Felisse Starker vs Theresa Kelly / Debbie Rosenthal6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesAlicia Cintron / Cindy Lannon vs Helen Brickfield / Jacqueline Mulhall6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFelisse Starker / Karen Pritchard vs Ann Sandercox / Theresa Kelly6-0, 6-4
2024-11-19vs 4S:Honey Deuces:Conklin/HaddadSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDawn Jackson / Daniela Sansone vs Ellen Conklin / Paula Park6-2, 6-7
L#3 DoublesPatricia Coomaraswamy / Linda Vlahakis vs Janet Aitoro / Susan Stryker3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-11-15vs 4S:Honey Deuces:Conklin/HaddadSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlicia Cintron / Cindy Lannon vs Franziska Haight / Kathleen Murdock6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesFelisse Starker / Karen Pritchard vs Rachel Belden / Karen Connors6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesAlicia Cintron / Cindy Lannon vs Susan Tibbetts / Diana Jackson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-22vs 4S:Honey Deuces:Conklin/HaddadWon 20
W#1 DoublesDawn Jackson / Daniela Sansone vs Ellen Conklin / Tracy Haddad6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCindy Lannon / Alicia Cintron vs Laura Denis / Marie Lima6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesDaniela Sansone / Dawn Jackson vs Susan Tibbetts / Diana Jackson7-5, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 55 & Over Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Daniela Sansone
published 3.5
2.90
Kimberly Servas
published
2.81
Alicia Cintron
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Dawn Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Patricia Coomaraswamy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Cindy Lannon
published 3
2.63
Felisse Starker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Jill Luciani
published
2.57
Ani Khachian
published 3
2.46
Karen Pritchard
published
2.43
Monica Lynn
published
Laura Carroll
published
Linda Vlahakis
published
Peggy Erlenkotter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alicia Cintron + Patricia Coomaraswamy6653% games+10.1% vs expected
Alicia Cintron + Daniela Sansone11654% games+1.1% vs expected
Patricia Coomaraswamy + Daniela Sansone6259% games+0.0% vs expected
Dawn Jackson + Daniela Sansone161653% games−0.2% vs expected
Alicia Cintron + Felisse Starker5647% games−7.4% vs expected
Jill Luciani + Monica Lynn1436% games−8.3% vs expected
Laura Carroll + Monica Lynn0529% games−27.4% vs expected
Cindy Lannon + Alicia Cintron6251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniela Sansone
150W–116L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Kimberly Servas
25W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Alicia Cintron
197W–128L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Dawn Jackson
91W–105L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Patricia Coomaraswamy
65W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Cindy Lannon
53W–120L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Felisse Starker
98W–115L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63
Jill Luciani
23W–25L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Ani Khachian
51W–48L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
Karen Pritchard
28W–40L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.46
Monica Lynn
19W–44L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.43
Laura Carroll
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Vlahakis
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Erlenkotter
24W–30L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.