Teams

LTFC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.06 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-16vs LTFC ORANGEWon 31
L#1 DoublesSelket Allen / Beth Zubowicz vs Alison Finley / Megan Ryall3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMeghan Balderston vs Venita Vereen2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Zhang / Kaori Dowling vs Ashley Agrelius / Krista Vickery6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDenise Tappen / Leslie DeVilliers vs Cathie Frazzini / Elodie de Fabrique3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-09vs SS-H BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesSelket Allen / Victoria Burgess vs Marty Smith / Linda Bartels3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSusana Wanken vs Kiersten Paul2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBeth Zubowicz / Kaori Dowling vs Jill Spehalski / Mia Settlemire6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDenise Tappen / Leslie DeVilliers vs Ann Grace / Inge Bentz2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-07-02vs HW REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesKaori Dowling / Susana Wanken vs Susan Stroeher / Amy Kinney6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMeghan Balderston vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie DeVilliers / Denise Tappen vs Tanya Maierhofer / Monica Hustead6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSarah Zhang / Victoria Burgess vs Kathy Norford / Kami Guarino6-1, 6-1
2024-06-25vs FOX NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesSelket Allen / Victoria Burgess vs Ann Louden / Janet Jewell3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMeghan Balderston vs Virginia Reichert6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSusana Wanken / Sarah Zhang vs Jody Walker / Carole Dagnon6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLeslie DeVilliers / Denise Tappen vs Martha Riley / Lana Pierce2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-06-18vs WC NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesSarah Zhang / Kaori Dowling vs Kate Mayoss / Jamelle Leyden2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMeghan Balderston vs Robin Carroll6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVictoria Burgess / Selket Allen vs Becky Hodous / Melissa Klein6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDenise Tappen / Leslie DeVilliers vs Stacy Burd / Andrea Milanovich6-0, 6-4
2024-06-11vs HFII GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSarah Zhang / Kaori Dowling vs Sandra Stephenson / DNita Andrews6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSelket Allen vs Julie Garside6-3, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSusana Wanken / Denise Tappen vs Paige Jones / Rene Meale6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeidi Elliott / Beth Zubowicz vs Julie Sanders / Clare Ambrose0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-04vs PRC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaori Dowling / Sarah Zhang vs Denise Dickson / Brenda Amundsen6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMeghan Balderston vs Lori McDevitt6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusana Wanken / Victoria Burgess vs Sherri Hutcheon / Heather Stohlton2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBeth Zubowicz / Heidi Elliott vs Shannon Bice / Denise Kulek6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Kaori Dowling
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.89
Meghan Balderston
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.83
Selket Allen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
Denise Tappen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Victoria Burgess
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.50
Beth Zubowicz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Leslie DeVilliers
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.49
Heidi Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Susana Wanken
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Tappen + Leslie DeVilliers5155% games+7.1% vs expected
Kaori Dowling + Selket Allen9259% games+3.5% vs expected
Denise Tappen + Selket Allen4253% games+3.2% vs expected
Heidi Elliott + Beth Zubowicz201951% games+3.1% vs expected
Leslie DeVilliers + Selket Allen2447% games−1.7% vs expected
Denise Tappen + Susana Wanken134 matchesnot enough data
Susana Wanken + Victoria Burgess224 matchesnot enough data
Victoria Burgess + Selket Allen314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kaori Dowling
72W–22L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
4.35
4
Meghan Balderston
49W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Selket Allen
96W–127L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Denise Tappen
25W–20L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Victoria Burgess
39W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Beth Zubowicz
53W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Leslie DeVilliers
92W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.49
4
Heidi Elliott
57W–70L career · 2 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.49
4
Susana Wanken
146W–92L career · 5 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.