Teams

HMTC PURPLE

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-15vs HMTC TEALLost 04
L#1 DoublesMichele MacHado / Judy Stout vs Kristin Daniels / Vivian Watson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKalyn Wegher vs Alli Lackey3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathi Freemann / Mary Gabiola vs Susan Seiler / Michelle Fang1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLinda Berkheim / Jane Koepp vs Anne Spry / Ingrid Parsons1-6, 5-7
2024-07-08vs FCCC WHITELost 13
L#1 DoublesLinda Berkheim / Mary Gabiola vs Marla Terwilliger / Tara Delaney4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Bona vs Jane Roberti2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Overman / Judy Stout vs Angie Decklever / Michelle Kennedy4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Hulse / Jane Koepp vs Denise Benz / Shannon Holt7-5, 6-3
2024-07-03vs LVTA SILVERLost 04
L#1 DoublesKathi Freemann / Michele MacHado vs Jessica Oldfield / Amanda Snowdon0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Bona vs Kristi van Buren2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Berkheim / Kalyn Wegher vs Sarah Duty / Magdalena Joyce4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Overman / Jane Koepp vs Helen Dunnington / Geneva Ritsch4-6, 1-6
2024-06-24vs TAG PINKLost 13
L#1 DoublesLinda Berkheim / Michele MacHado vs Stacie Emarine / Thora Pabst6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKalyn Wegher vs Dawn Setser2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMary Hulse / Kathi Freemann vs Beth Smits / Sandy Chenore2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Taub / Jane Koepp vs Deirdre White / Sandy Hamilton6-0, 6-3
2024-06-17vs CSU GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesJudy Stout / Jane Koepp vs Marcia Stauter / Wendy Sprague5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Bona vs Tiffany Croci6-7, 0-0
L#2 DoublesMary Gabiola / Sandra Overman vs Jamie Heckman / Audrie Diel4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Hulse / Donna Taub vs Carri Miller / Shannon Bigner1-6, 0-6
2024-06-10vs LT BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesKathi Freemann / Mary Hulse vs Brandi Murphy / Cindy Short7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMichele MacHado vs Maka Hammock3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Gabiola / Sandra Overman vs Lisa Martin / Carol Hiller7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Taub / Jane Koepp vs Katherine Prudhomme / Joyce Depagnier4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-03vs LT ORANGELost 13
L#1 DoublesMary Gabiola / Michele MacHado vs Janice Sale / Tina Spicer3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKalyn Wegher vs Carolyn Everhart6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Berkheim / Kathi Freemann vs Shirley Moore / Deborah Lockwood6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSandra Overman / Donna Taub vs Bernita Sterling / Lora Griffith1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Bona
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Donna Taub
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Mary Gabiola
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.67
Kalyn Wegher
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Michele MacHado
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.58
Linda Berkheim
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.40
Judy Stout
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jane Koepp
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Kathi Freemann
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Mary Hulse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sandra Overman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Koepp + Donna Taub7454% games+7.5% vs expected
Michele MacHado + Mary Gabiola2641% games−2.8% vs expected
Kathi Freemann + Michele MacHado1539% games−7.0% vs expected
Michele MacHado + Judy Stout1636% gamesnot enough data
Linda Berkheim + Mary Gabiola2437% gamesnot enough data
Judy Stout + Mary Gabiola1534% gamesnot enough data
Mary Hulse + Donna Taub1535% gamesnot enough data
Linda Berkheim + Michele MacHado044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Bona
5W–22L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Donna Taub
14W–27L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Mary Gabiola
61W–86L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Kalyn Wegher
15W–57L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Michele MacHado
30W–99L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Linda Berkheim
48W–86L career · 5 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Judy Stout
35W–126L career · 3 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.40
Jane Koepp
19W–23L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathi Freemann
14W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Hulse
25W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Overman
7W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.