Teams

Piccolo -Sanchez/Alizo

2022 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Fall Night · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-11-16vs Pompano - CassidySplit 11
W#2 DoublesJorge Balsamo / Andre Sophia vs David Aizer / Brian Stephanak6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAugusto Alizo / Roberto Nieves vs William Hoaglin / Frank Rosso6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-11-09vs Jetc - CundySplit 11
W#1 DoublesRAUL SANCHEZ DOMINGUEZ / Jorge Balsamo vs George Flavell / Garnett Byrd6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRafael Oropeza / Jorge J Espejo Sigler vs David Perrin / James OBrien4-6, 1-6
2021-11-02Split 11
L#2 SinglesJorge Balsamo vs Hiram Zuniga4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAugusto Alizo / Roberto Nieves vs CHRISTIAN ORELLANA / Matt Olender2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-10-26vs Parkland - NobletWon 20
W#2 DoublesAugusto Alizo / Roberto Nieves vs Jose Ramirez / Martin Olivencia6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRAUL SANCHEZ DOMINGUEZ / Jorge Balsamo vs Mike Noblet / Tony Abid6-3, 6-2
2021-10-05vs WinnerParkland - lesWon 10
W#2 DoublesAugusto Alizo / Roberto Nieves vs Cody Wall / Anthony Sirianni6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Andre Sophia
published 4.5
4.30
4.26
Ignacio Sarria
published 4.5
3.88
Fabricio Tobar
published 4
3.85
Roberto Nieves
published
3.84
Alberto Espejo
published 4
3.70
Jorge Balsamo
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.68
Augusto Alizo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Rubens Jacob
published
3.61
Stanley Tsung
published
3.52
Rafael Oropeza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rafael Oropeza + Jorge Balsamo5063% gamesnot enough data
Jorge Balsamo + Augusto Alizo3259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andre Sophia
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
4.48
Jorge J Espejo Sigler
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Ignacio Sarria
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
Oscar Ricardo Marquez Tortoriello
12W–9L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
4.18
4
Fabricio Tobar
19W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.88
Roberto Nieves
25W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Alberto Espejo
10W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Jorge Balsamo
180W–109L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Augusto Alizo
89W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Rubens Jacob
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Stanley Tsung
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Rafael Oropeza
91W–105L career · 1 line in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.