Teams

Gambel/55s/3.5/NC Day

2025 Man · Cov Adult 55 & Over - Women Day

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-07Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSheryl Scobel / Mary Riehlmann vs Beth Morris / Sheila Wittie2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 55 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Abby Morse
usually #3 Doubles 34%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published 3
2.79
Beth Daschbach
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.63
Beth Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Grace Gambel
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Hope Himel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Tracey
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
Martine Naquin
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Mary Riehlmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michella Ford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sheryl Scobel
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abby Morse + Karen Tracey4747% gamesnot enough data
Sheryl Scobel + Beth Daschbach2446% gamesnot enough data
Sheryl Scobel + Martine Naquin1542% gamesnot enough data
Beth Daschbach + Martine Naquin314 matchesnot enough data
Grace Gambel + Karen Tracey044 matchesnot enough data
Karen Tracey + Hope Himel134 matchesnot enough data
Beth Gonzales + Sheryl Scobel123 matchesnot enough data
Abby Morse + Grace Gambel033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Abby Morse
20W–35L career · 32 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Beth Daschbach
12W–20L career · 20 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Beth Gonzales
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Grace Gambel
7W–20L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hope Himel
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Tracey
21W–49L career · 33 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martine Naquin
11W–18L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Riehlmann
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michella Ford
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheryl Scobel
4W–17L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.