← Teams

LOTC-Vedder/Norris

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Nicole Vedder
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Yanchen Qi
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Devrie Brennan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Natasha Rinard
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.20
Robyn Hilden
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.08
Betty Roux
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2020-03-08Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesCarrie Norris / Robyn Hilden vs Sharon Patricelli / Amy Thomas6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBarbara Streeter / Devrie Brennan vs Ruth Semon / Elizabeth Maguire6-3, 6-0
2020-03-01Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesCarrie Norris / Robyn Hilden vs Brooke Daniel / Melissa Gibson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNatasha Rinard vs Kristen LaBarca6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Drew / Nicole Vedder vs Shelly Bigley / Sarah Robertson6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBetty Roux vs Gretchen Sturm6-4, 6-1
2020-02-22Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesMarianne Conroy / Natasha Rinard vs Mary Jane Toolson / Virginia Martinez6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesBetty Roux vs Nancy Lowenberg6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesYanchen Qi vs Diane Nelson6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDevrie Brennan / Toni Strutz vs Teresa Darling / Trish Carder6-4, 6-2
2020-02-08Won 5–0
W#1 DoublesCarrie Norris / Robyn Hilden vs Claire C Gates / Rosaleen Harte6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNatasha Rinard vs Karen Ostrye6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNicole Vedder / Rachael Wight vs Achala Kaushikkar / Barbara Lolich6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBetty Roux vs Judy Friedman6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDevrie Brennan / Jennifer Drew vs Cindy Rowe / Jane Sadowski6-1, 6-2
2020-01-24Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJennifer Drew / Nicole Vedder vs Alana Miner / Molly Hemsley6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesRobyn Hilden vs Kimi Rucker6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNatasha Rinard vs Carol Glenn6-0, 6-0
2020-01-19Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJennifer Drew / Nicole Vedder vs Christina Bergstrom / Wanda Ng7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNatasha Rinard vs Michiyo Nozaki6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesBetty Roux vs Jing Feng6-4, 6-3
2020-01-11Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesCarrie Norris / Robyn Hilden vs Marjorie Brinck / Jane King Ayers6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesBetty Roux vs Jing Li6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNicole Vedder / Sanae Ito vs Michele Kreager / Rachel Nies - *6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesYanchen Qi vs Naun Yvonne Kim6-2, 6-2
2020-01-04Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesCarrie Norris / Robyn Hilden vs Michelle Zawadzki / Kelsey McGinnis6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBetty Roux vs Leslie Cole6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarianne Conroy / Yanchen Qi vs Anita Palodichuk / Kathy Cooke7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDevrie Brennan vs Mary Stevenson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Nicole Vedder
32W–37L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Yanchen Qi
29W–55L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Devrie Brennan
53W–47L career
1%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Natasha Rinard
57W–51L career
3%97%0%
3.21
3.5
Robyn Hilden
86W–68L career
3%97%0%
3.20
3.5
Betty Roux
101W–106L career · type A
18%82%0%
3.08

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.