← Teams

WHRC-Friedman

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Judith Kobin
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
—
Sibyl Jarrett
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.92
Suzanne Friedman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Stephany Mo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Michelle Ruby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results7 ties
2018-11-11Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesStephany Mo / Sibyl Jarrett vs Madeline Shotwell / Carilyn Alexander6-1, 6-3
2018-11-10Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJudith Kobin / Caryn Cohen vs Alexa Haskard / Deborah Rhoades6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStephany Mo / Michelle Ruby vs Kathleen Cooney / Diane Harris6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2018-11-04Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesSusan Eldridge / Sibyl Jarrett vs Ann Davidson / Janet Cathcart6-0, 6-2
2018-10-20Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDiane Hardman / Sibyl Jarrett vs Pat Berends / Linda Clayton3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanice Kettler / Stephany Mo vs Melba Davidson / Kathy Siebers6-1, 6-3
2018-09-28Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJudith Kobin / Hildie Oliver vs Janet Cathcart / Susan Suttich6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCaryn Cohen / Suzanne Friedman vs Ann Davidson / Susan Sanborn6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2018-09-16Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesGisele Lamarre / Michelle Ruby vs Kay Hallmark / Hideko Kershaw6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDiane Hardman / Sibyl Jarrett vs Stephanie Arnheim / Anne Vanderlinden7-6, 6-4
2018-09-08Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSibyl Jarrett / Hildie Oliver vs Karen Oyler / Saki Newman6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Friedman / Gisele Lamarre vs Janet Collier / Linda Clayton4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Judith Kobin
90W–95L career
34%66%0%
3.50
3.5
Sibyl Jarrett
36W–73L career
not enough data
—
3
Suzanne Friedman
25W–28L career
0%88%12%
2.92
3
Stephany Mo
54W–49L career
0%98%2%
2.85
3
Michelle Ruby
8W–12L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.