Teams

10 Magnolia Green Winters

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-06vs 2 ACAC Slice Slice Baby - RiceLost 03
L#1 SinglesMolly Palenski vs Amanda Rice1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKeri Biggins vs Raven Fisher6-7, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSamantha Petrich vs Ashley Diersen2-6, 3-6
2025-11-04vs 7 ACAC CurtisLost 03
L#1 SinglesSunanda Desai vs Mary Wagoner7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNatalie Winters vs Kari Bivins4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Conrad vs Margaret Thompson3-6, 3-6
2025-10-21vs 3 MTC Singles Ladies - HannonLost 12
L#1 SinglesMolly Palenski vs Amanda Phillips3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKeri Biggins vs Sky Lee1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesSamantha Petrich vs Angela Futrell6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-14vs 20 Burkwood Lu GoldenLost 12
W#1 SinglesMolly Palenski vs Christine Lu6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSamantha Petrich vs Megan Jernigan0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Conrad vs Brooke van Zandt6-7, 3-6
2025-10-11vs 17 CCV PeanutsWon 21
W#1 SinglesSunanda Desai vs Julie Shudtz6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKeri Biggins vs Cara Patterson4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesSamantha Petrich vs Lacy Briney6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-09vs 5 ACAC Strobl's Single LadiesLost 12
W#1 SinglesMolly Palenski vs Cecilia Bergh6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSamantha Petrich vs Myrna Abed6-7, 4-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Conrad vs Jessica Cox2-6, 3-6
2025-09-23vs 13 Bon Air Powers Put AwaysLost 12
W#1 SinglesNatalie Winters vs Paige Wesselink6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKeri Biggins vs Robin Balsamo1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSamantha Petrich vs Heather Hogan6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Sunanda Desai
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.67
Jennifer Conrad
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.42
Samantha Petrich
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Keri Biggins
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Molly Palenski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Natalie Winters
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sunanda Desai
26W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Jennifer Conrad
17W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.67
Samantha Petrich
7W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.42
Keri Biggins
8W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Palenski
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Winters
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.