Teams

WRAC-Noyd

2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-10vs CBRC-MehlenbacherWon 30
W#1 DoublesKIMBERLY HABICH / Brad Bartol vs Kent Ozkardesh / Gail Sears6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelley Quinn / Michael Bendtsen vs Todd Samuel / Huijuan Zhang6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDarillyn Flones / Bryan Noyd vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Paula Davis-Vedder6-2, 6-1
2022-07-10vs SC-RacqueteersWon 30
W#1 DoublesKIMBERLY HABICH / Brad Bartol vs Karen Cramer / James Cramer6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelley Quinn / Michael Bendtsen vs Janice Leitner / Wayne Leitner6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDarillyn Flones / Mark Taylor vs Kimberly Bayley / Nicholas Geranios6-3, 6-1
2022-07-09vs CBRC-MehlenbacherWon 21
W#1 DoublesKIMBERLY HABICH / Brad Bartol vs Kent Ozkardesh / Maria Davis6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelley Quinn / Michael Bendtsen vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Paula Davis-Vedder7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDarillyn Flones / Mark Taylor vs Todd Samuel / Huijuan Zhang3-6, 4-6
2022-07-09vs SC-RacqueteersWon 30
W#1 DoublesKIMBERLY HABICH / Brad Bartol vs Theresa Koehler / Craig Hansen6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelley Quinn / Michael Bendtsen vs Kimberly Bayley / Mark Gray6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDarillyn Flones / Mark Taylor vs Janice Leitner / Wayne Leitner6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WRAC-Noyd40111469
2SC-Racqueteers0401224146

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brad Bartol
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.28
Darillyn Flones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bryan Noyd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
KIMBERLY HABICH
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kelley Quinn
published
Mark Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Bendtsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

KIMBERLY HABICH + Brad Bartol7074% gamesnot enough data
Darillyn Flones + Bryan Noyd224 matchesnot enough data
Mark Taylor + Darillyn Flones213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad Bartol
39W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Darillyn Flones
40W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Bryan Noyd
23W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
KIMBERLY HABICH
63W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelley Quinn
64W–39L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Taylor
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Bendtsen
67W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.