Teams

CP-Racket Makers-Choi

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 5.0

19 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-23vs NWW-WSC-HennessyLost 02
L#1 DoublesBryce Danz / Vera Choi vs Julia Roast / Hector Hernandez1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKim Watkins / Zhentao Lin vs Caitlin Hennessy / Amol Hanwante2-6, 0-6
2024-11-16vs RTC-Pipi-HanLost 12
L#1 DoublesHelen Wang / Mark LeMaster vs Chen Yang / Xinyuan Yu4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesZhentao Lin / Ok Clark vs Alvin Han / Jiayi Ling4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBryce Danz / Rachel Zhao vs Man Feng / Shuai Lu2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-11-10vs ETC-Mix It Up-MuirWon 21
L#1 DoublesGe Wang / Mark LeMaster vs Neil Hinnant / Angela Patterson5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Wang / Zhentao Lin vs Michael Eng / Victoria Chen6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Trager / Rachel Zhao vs Sherry Shu / John Hogan6-1, 6-3
2024-11-02vs BTA-Racket Rebels-FaragWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Wang / Markus Mielke vs Dana Day / Hari Kancharlapalli2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBryce Danz / Ge Wang vs Zhixu Li / Jiayao Wang6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKit Merker / Rachel Zhao vs Sara Farag / James Thompson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-20vs NWW-ETC-BoxLost 12
W#1 DoublesHelen Wang / Mark LeMaster vs Laura Walsh / Miroslav Spassov7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Wang / Jeff Trager vs Marcia O'Donoghue / Devkumar Patel3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKexin Xu / Jeffrey Merrifield vs Alix Jansma / Ravdeep Pasricha1-6, 2-6
2024-10-11vs BTA-Racket Rebels-FaragWon 30
W#1 DoublesAtanas Koralski / Nely Koralska vs Dana Day / Rishi Nair6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBryce Danz / Rachel Zhao vs Vera Makianich / Iman Baghai6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Trager / Kexin Xu vs Jiayao Wang / Sathish Kumar Raman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-05vs RTC-Pipi-HanLost 03
L#1 DoublesDoug Chapman / Helen Wang vs Alvin Han / Jiayi Ling0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKit Merker / Vera Choi vs Shuai Lu / Xinyuan Yu0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Merrifield / Joleen Lester vs Ning Zhang / Yufeng Zhang3-6, 4-6
2024-09-22vs NWW-WSC-HennessyWon 21
W#1 DoublesAtanas Koralski / Nely Koralska vs Aviral Dua / Upasna Suman6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMark LeMaster / Ok Clark vs Christine Carilus / Conor Cahill4-6, 1-2
L#3 DoublesKim Watkins / Markus Mielke vs Seif Talat / Pamela Nelson5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWW-BC-McCullough802225127
2NWW-ETC-Box7120412147
3NWW-WSC-Hennessy7119514145
4ETC-Li5316818167
5ETC-Phony Forgers-Jaiswal5315922211
6RTC-Pipi-Han44121224198
7WSC-Ungureanasu44111329235
8CP-Racket Makers-Choi44121232241
9CAC/SL-Après Tennis-Betancourt3591531225
10MC-Kicking Aces-Turner2651938243
11ETC-Mix It Up-Muir1761837243
12FC-Basha Tennis1761839264
13BTA-Racket Rebels-Farag1732144268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Nely Koralska
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.01
Helen Wang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Kexin Xu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Ge Wang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Atanas Koralski
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.64
Amy Wang
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.56
Ok Clark
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.36
Zhentao Lin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Mark LeMaster
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.30
Markus Mielke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.16
Bryce Danz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.15
Kit Merker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.13
Kim Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.12
Vera Choi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.08
Jeffrey Merrifield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.95
Jeff Trager
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Doug Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joleen Lester
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Zhao
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Atanas Koralski + Nely Koralska9462% games+14.8% vs expected
Ok Clark + Mark LeMaster1526% games−11.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nely Koralska
44W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Helen Wang
31W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Kexin Xu
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Ge Wang
39W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Atanas Koralski
34W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Amy Wang
39W–65L career · 7 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Ok Clark
26W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Zhentao Lin
9W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.36
2.5
Mark LeMaster
13W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Markus Mielke
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.30
2.5
Bryce Danz
10W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Kit Merker
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.15
2.5
Kim Watkins
8W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Vera Choi
23W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Jeffrey Merrifield
2W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.08
2.5
Jeff Trager
29W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Doug Chapman
7W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Joleen Lester
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Zhao
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.