Teams

LWR Sosa

2024 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 8.0 W Thursday

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-03-28vs Sarasota/Seider/55&Over8.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDonna Dubinsky / Kathy Rain vs Joy Voke / Dorene Seider6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAngela Heck / Bernadette Waterman vs Judith Lubbers / Laura Peters2-6, 0-6
2024-03-21vs LWR ZeiglerWon 21
W#1 DoublesDonna Dubinsky / Kathy Rain vs Heidi Cox / DeAnne Fischer6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLu Circelli / Bernadette Waterman vs Karen Nicholson / Diana Stadelnikas4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHayley Englander / Karen Manger vs Karen Collins / Barbara Cogen3-6, 0-6
2024-03-14vs Plantation DipierroLost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Dubinsky / Kathy Rain vs Diane DeGurian / Kerry Distefano2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJane Doe / Hayley Englander vs Ana Areosa / Marjorie Petruccelli2-6, 2-6
2024-03-07vs SSC DavyWon 30
W#1 DoublesDonna Dubinsky / Angela Heck vs Marsha Timm / Donna Mink4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHayley Englander / Bernadette Waterman vs Brenda Dechow / Cathy Maler2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Manger / Kathy Rain vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-29vs River Strand QuirosLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarol Kloeppel / Bernadette Waterman vs Penny Franklin / Judi Wilson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Deitch / Kerstin Hylen-Sundstrom vs Lorraine Breidenstein / Chris Poole3-6, 4-6
2024-02-22vs Waterford DuncanSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDonna Dubinsky / Angela Heck vs Leila Wagner / Constance Duncan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Deitch / Karen Manger vs Deanna Allard / Barbara Belanger2-6, 3-6
2024-02-15vs Cedars Island Girls 8.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesDonna Dubinsky / Kathy Rain vs Elizabeth Scheible / Vickie Miller3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHayley Englander / Karen Manger vs Brenda Baril / Lisa Tyson6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-02-08vs Payne Park PerhaesWon 20
W#2 DoublesDonna Dubinsky / Angela Heck vs Linda Mulcahy / Debbie Mays6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHayley Englander / Jane Doe vs Lynn Heinz / Pamela Mousseau6-4, 6-1
2024-02-04Won 20
W#2 DoublesDonna Dubinsky / Angela Heck vs Leslie Miller / Sandy Kreighbaum3-6, 6-6
W#3 DoublesHayley Englander / Jane Doe vs Julie Leprohon / Jane Harper6-0, 7-6
2024-01-25vs LWN GillisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSheila Sosa / Kathy Rain vs Cindy Markowitz / Karen Kelly7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKerstin Hylen-Sundstrom / Carol Kloeppel vs Mary Gill / Sherry Chase3-6, 4-6
2024-01-11vs LBK Public SchonhoffSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDonna Dubinsky / Angela Heck vs Mary Jane Waite / Karen Kurgan7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Deitch / Hayley Englander vs Ute Vela-Marquez / Audra Ramsey2-6, 3-6
2024-01-04vs Mission Valley GibbsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Manger / Kathy Rain vs Sandra Mooney / Brenda Hibbeln5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesHayley Englander / Jane Doe vs Jennifer Jaworski / HelenAnne Quigley7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Kathy Rain
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.70
Donna Dubinsky
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.64
Lu Circelli
published
3.58
Andrea Deitch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Bernadette Waterman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Kerstin Hylen-Sundstrom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Hayley Englander
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Sheila Sosa
published
3.13
Angela Heck
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Dubinsky + Kathy Rain232650% games+1.6% vs expected
Andrea Deitch + Hayley Englander21042% games−3.3% vs expected
Andrea Deitch + Kathy Rain9752% gamesnot enough data
Hayley Englander + Donna Dubinsky5449% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Deitch + Kerstin Hylen-Sundstrom4148% gamesnot enough data
Hayley Englander + Kerstin Hylen-Sundstrom3248% gamesnot enough data
Kerstin Hylen-Sundstrom + Kathy Rain123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kathy Rain
91W–94L career · 7 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Donna Dubinsky
62W–68L career · 9 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Lu Circelli
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Andrea Deitch
124W–100L career · 3 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Bernadette Waterman
57W–57L career · 4 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
Kerstin Hylen-Sundstrom
45W–54L career · 2 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Hayley Englander
32W–48L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Sheila Sosa
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
3.35
3.5
Angela Heck
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.