Teams

Hermitage Hardesty

2021 Richmond Working Women · Working Women 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-06-07vs Bon Air BrownWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesAMY LINES / Michelle Harman vs Stacy Durand / Melanie Agee-Wade6-1, 6-0
2021-04-27vs Raintree Cheek LadiesWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesKatherine Faraci / AMY LINES vs Alexis Bullard / Laura Earle6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Working Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
AMY LINES
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Brittany Nichols
published 3.5
3.29
Sarah Martin
published
3.02
Renee Fisher
published
3.01
Kirsten Knull
published
2.92
2.40
Virginia Cochran
published
2.23
Margaretha Valderas
published
Monica Walsh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Martin + Renee Fisher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
220W–87L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
3.97
3.5
Brittany Nichols
14W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.34
Sarah Martin
15W–8L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
Renee Fisher
4W–11L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.02
Kirsten Knull
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Elizabeth Wiertel
29W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
2.92
Virginia Cochran
3W–8L career · no lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
2.40
Margaretha Valderas
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
0%98%2%
2.23
Monica Walsh
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.