Teams

Claiborne/Nealy/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 2.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-04vs Doucet/NashvilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Nealy / Rita Spellings vs Kristin Sanderson / Megan Palmer6-0, 6-2
2026-04-21vs Armor/NashvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRita Spellings / Michelle Nealy vs Carrie O'Connell / Jazmen Howard6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJenny Hamrick vs Daria Sharova0-6, 0-6
2026-04-14Won 21
L#1 DoublesJenny Hamrick / Caroline Maloy vs Jelena Jozic / Danielle Tolly0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Nealy vs Lauren Hamby6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRita Spellings / Caroline Shaub vs Kate Mendolia / Chelsea Rand6-1, 6-0
2026-03-31vs Armor/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesJenny Hamrick / Katie Claiborne vs Mary Elizabeth Armor / Keira Yu1-6, 0-6
2026-03-24vs Barron/NashvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle Nealy / Rita Spellings vs Caroline Malone / Alex Barron6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKatie Claiborne vs Brittany Tripp1-6, 0-6
2026-03-17vs Gilliland/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaroline Shaub / Katie Claiborne vs Rebecca Gilliland / Kate Lathen0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJenny Hamrick vs Allyson Cundiff1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Nealy / Rita Spellings vs Ellen Hoffman / Katheryn Pilkerton6-1, 6-2
2026-03-10vs Doucet/NashvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKatie Claiborne / Caroline Shaub vs Ana Amodaj / Joy Porter6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Nealy / Rita Spellings vs Emily Doucet / Eleanor Porter6-1, 6-1
2026-03-03vs Logan/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Claiborne / Michelle Nealy vs Whitney Kemp / Lindsay Logan3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRita Spellings vs Katharine Buliga2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJenny Hamrick / Caroline Spann vs Katy Hentenaar / Julie Rousseau4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.07 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.44
Rita Spellings
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
2.06
Michelle Nealy
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.96
Katie Claiborne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
1.82
Jenny Hamrick
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rita Spellings + Michelle Nealy8170% games+27.2% vs expected
Katie Claiborne + Michelle Nealy044 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Hamrick + Katie Claiborne033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rita Spellings
13W–13L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%67%33%
2.44
Michelle Nealy
12W–15L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Katie Claiborne
0W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Jenny Hamrick
0W–25L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.