Teams

V - Royal Aces

2022 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over - VENT · Ventura - Women 3.5 WE

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 DoublesRenee Kieselbach / Jennifer Modglin vs Barbara Heitman / Dana Hibner0-6, 4-6
2022-11-12vs V - Sherwood Stars WELost 01
L#3 DoublesCynthia Clark / Kathryn Pisaro vs Connie Mundell / Rosella Farnum4-6, 4-6
2022-11-06vs V - Sunset Hot ShotsLost 01
L#3 DoublesVicky Modglin / Kathryn Pisaro vs Linda Merkle / Megan Mathews0-6, 5-7
2022-10-23vs V - WAC JobsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Modglin / Renee Kieselbach vs Patti Wilson / Patti McNamara2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCynthia Clark / Kathryn Pisaro vs Susan Cass / Georgann Lott3-6, 0-6
2022-10-16vs V - Ojai OrangesLost 01
L#2 DoublesLauriann Garland / Renee Kieselbach vs Susan Tadevic / Tahnie Toland3-6, 6-7
2022-10-09vs V - Moorpark Acing GracefullyLost 01
L#3 DoublesCynthia Clark / Kathryn Pisaro vs Jennifer Hammond / Lisa Trombley0-6, 2-6
2022-10-01vs V - LLW WACPennPals-J GuinnLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer House / Renee Kieselbach vs Laura Mealer / Kathleen Schatz6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-09-22vs V - North Ranch Ace AngelsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer House / Renee Kieselbach vs Mary Carpenter / Marti Spencer1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Marilyn Germann
published
3.09
Vicky Modglin
published
3.09
Jennifer Modglin
published
2.97
2.88
Lara Docherty
published
2.79
Kathryn Pisaro
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.78
Renee Kieselbach
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.50
Patricia Francisco
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Modglin + Vicky Modglin4157% games−2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marilyn Germann
9W–22L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
Vicky Modglin
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
Jennifer Modglin
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Yvonne Esquerra-Bard
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
Lara Docherty
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.88
3
Kathryn Pisaro
74W–90L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Renee Kieselbach
54W–83L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Patricia Francisco
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.