Teams

Kuhn

2024 TRI-LEVEL - POCATELLO · Men's 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.79 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-04-24vs UpsettersWon 21
W#1 DoublesThomas Gwinn / Cory Spicer vs Russell Ward / Joeri Klutsch7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarter Christiansen / Enoch Ward vs Andre E Kohler / James Hickey6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRene Sepulveda Castro / Nelson Ward vs Morrgan Michaelson / Russell Duffey2-6, 6-7
2024-04-20vs Guess whoLost 12
L#1 DoublesCory Spicer / Brent Harmon vs Bobby Arteaga / Thaddeus Hansen6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesEnoch Ward / Darren Kuhn vs Joe Andersen / Mark Lynn3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn M Head / David Davis vs Howard Hansen / Trenton Murray6-4, 6-4
2024-04-15vs LFGWon 30
W#1 DoublesThomas Gwinn / Cory Spicer vs David Brake / Richard Bitton7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJon Stoner / Carter Christiansen vs Zac Gershberg / Joshua Ellis2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRene Sepulveda Castro / Nelson Ward vs Shawn Oram / Brendan McGeehan6-3, 7-6
2024-04-13vs UpsettersWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrent Harmon / Thomas Gwinn vs Noah Wang / Russell Ward2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJon Stoner / Carter Christiansen vs LEIF TAPANILA / Andre E Kohler7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJohn M Head / Rene Sepulveda Castro vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-06vs Guess whoWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrent Harmon / Cory Spicer vs Antonio Tahhan / Thaddeus Hansen6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCarter Christiansen / Enoch Ward vs Darren Hansen / Mark Lynn6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn M Head / David Davis vs Howard Hansen / David Lu6-1, 6-2
2024-03-30vs LFGLost 12
L#1 DoublesCory Spicer / Brent Harmon vs David Brake / Richard Bitton1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarter Christiansen / Darren Kuhn vs Zac Gershberg / Nathan Richardson5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNelson Ward / David Davis vs Pat Gates / Brendan McGeehan6-3, 7-5
2024-03-28vs UpsettersLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Davis / Nelson Ward vs Morrgan Michaelson / Matthew Peterson0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJon Stoner / Darren Kuhn vs James Hickey / Jordon Michaelson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesThomas Gwinn / Cory Spicer vs Russell Ward / Joeri Klutsch6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-03-12vs Guess whoWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrent Harmon / Thomas Gwinn vs Thaddeus Hansen / Darren Hansen6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJon Stoner / Carter Christiansen vs Joe Andersen / Ali Habashi6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJohn M Head / David Davis vs David Lu / Levi Jensen6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-03-09vs LFGWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrent Harmon / Thomas Gwinn vs David Brake / Richard Bitton2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJon Stoner / Enoch Ward vs Nathan Richardson / Zac Gershberg6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn M Head / Nelson Ward vs Shawn Oram / Brendan McGeehan2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Men's 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Upsetters63171024225
2Kuhn63171025241
3LFG45131430240
4Guess who2772043298

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Cory Spicer
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.83
Thomas Gwinn
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
Carter Christiansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Enoch Ward
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Brent Harmon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Darren Kuhn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Rene Sepulveda Castro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
John M Head
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Stoner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nelson Ward
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cory Spicer + Thomas Gwinn4163% games+16.2% vs expected
Darren Kuhn + Thomas Gwinn8167% games+5.5% vs expected
Brent Harmon + Darren Kuhn23759% games+0.7% vs expected
Brent Harmon + Thomas Gwinn3649% games−4.9% vs expected
Thomas Gwinn + John M Head5066% gamesnot enough data
Jon Stoner + Darren Kuhn404 matchesnot enough data
Cory Spicer + Brent Harmon123 matchesnot enough data
Jon Stoner + Carter Christiansen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cory Spicer
68W–58L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Thomas Gwinn
190W–82L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Carter Christiansen
41W–41L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Enoch Ward
84W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Brent Harmon
201W–144L career · 6 lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Darren Kuhn
290W–96L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
3
Rene Sepulveda Castro
87W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
John M Head
76W–74L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jon Stoner
28W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nelson Ward
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.