← Teams

SAC-Brady/Hummel

2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 2.89 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Tom Hsu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Lina Gao
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Gerald Snell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Paul Koenigsberg
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.60
Lori Andersen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.56
Rutvij Desai
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.52
James Araujo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Natasha Brady
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Dano Ehler
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2025-08-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKalpana Berman / James Araujo vs Todd Shupp / Melissa Lanceta7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTom Hsu / Denise Butchee vs Kavan Puranik / Kathleen Coughran6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDano Ehler / Janet Hummel vs Michael Funke / Heidi Funke6-3, 6-1
2025-08-03Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesNatasha Brady / James Araujo vs Melinda Magaddino / Paul Garrahan6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKalpana Berman / Paul Koenigsberg vs Margo Yohner / Jason Trinchero7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTom Hsu / Jann Purdy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-02Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJames Araujo / Kalpana Berman vs Jamie Melton / Josh Berezin6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJanet Hummel / Paul Koenigsberg vs Vanessa Gallant / Terrence Trausch7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGerald Snell / Jann Purdy vs Adam Jaschek / Michelle Gay6-1, 6-1
2025-07-26Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLori Andersen / Rutvij Desai vs Dawan Pandya / Manoj Pandya6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesClaudia Porter / Paul Koenigsberg vs Mihee Park / Matt Vuylsteke6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLina Gao / Dano Ehler vs Jungah Kim / Jihoon Bang6-1, 6-4
2025-07-20Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesPaul Koenigsberg / Lina Gao vs Teresa Chan / Luis Ponce de Leon6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDenise Butchee / Gerald Snell vs Laurel Hallock Koppelman / Paul Ecker6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTom Hsu / Sally Chen vs Deborah Cohen / Stephen Doubleday6-2, 6-1
2025-07-06Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJames Araujo / Natasha Brady vs Jody McCord / Adriana McCord6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLori Andersen / Rutvij Desai vs Emily Shue / Dan Shue6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDano Ehler / Denise Butchee vs Wendy Vail / Douglas Hill6-3, 6-2
2025-06-22Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesPaul Koenigsberg / Denise Butchee vs Reno Brown / Josette Zervic6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRutvij Desai / Sally Chen vs Douglas Bennett / Cindy Bennett6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLina Gao / Dano Ehler vs Dominique Johnson / Brett Johnson6-3, 6-3
2025-06-13Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLori Andersen / Rutvij Desai vs Melissa Gitt / Ned Cannon6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNatasha Brady / Tom Hsu vs Marianne McIntosh / Brentley Boger7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanet Hummel / Gerald Snell vs Shannon Wagner / Jed Macy2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Tom Hsu
28W–30L career
0%99%1%
2.80
3
Lina Gao
46W–86L career
0%100%0%
2.78
3
Gerald Snell
3W–23L career · type A
2%98%1%
2.75
3
Paul Koenigsberg
13W–18L career · type M
3%95%1%
2.75
2.5
Lori Andersen
31W–87L career
0%10%90%
2.60
3
Rutvij Desai
6W–18L career · type A
23%77%0%
2.56
3
James Araujo
77W–184L career
27%73%0%
2.52
3
Natasha Brady
33W–101L career
51%49%0%
2.44
2.5
Dano Ehler
1W–17L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.