Teams

LTFCS CORDASCO

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-07-14Won 10
W#1 SinglesBen Hindell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-23vs CCW MAILLOUXLost 01
L#3 DoublesBen Hindell / Ben Lowe vs Jeff Mailloux / Eric Burns1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Ben Lowe
published 4
3.91
Keith Logeman
published
3.89
Marc Whorton
published
3.77
MICHAEL REECE
published
Ben Lobato
published 4
3.75
Joseph D Sawyer
published
3.67
Steven Spillers
published
3.59
Boyen Malillos
published 4
3.42
Ben Hindell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Jason Egger
published
John Cordasco
published
John Shepard
published
Steve Nickless
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MICHAEL REECE + Marc Whorton11065% games+10.7% vs expected
Joseph D Sawyer + Steve Nickless4161% games+8.6% vs expected
Boyen Malillos + MICHAEL REECE5262% games+7.3% vs expected
Joseph D Sawyer + Keith Logeman3258% games+2.0% vs expected
MICHAEL REECE + Steven Spillers7554% games+0.8% vs expected
Steven Spillers + Keith Logeman7354% games−0.8% vs expected
John Shepard + John Cordasco3446% games−6.1% vs expected
MICHAEL REECE + Keith Logeman5454% games−6.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ben Lowe
65W–25L career · no lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.96
Keith Logeman
49W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%24%
3.91
Marc Whorton
34W–28L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.89
MICHAEL REECE
60W–46L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Ben Lobato
5W–18L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Joseph D Sawyer
32W–26L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.75
Steven Spillers
23W–21L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Boyen Malillos
22W–27L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Ben Hindell
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jason Egger
19W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
John Cordasco
11W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
John Shepard
8W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Steve Nickless
12W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.