Teams

ABoone-BP

2025 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Weekend

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-05vs DBaker40-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Schmitz / Liza Terll vs Yolanda Deaver / Amy Singer4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Boone / Delisa Ordronneau vs Kim Hutter / Kristi Brubaker2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCJ Dearinger / Lindsay Powell vs Pamela Howell-Davis / Janet Ranheim1-6, 1-6
2025-09-20vs MGriffiths-CHTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Schmitz / Liza Terll vs Colleen Starns / Sandra Stowe6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLori Salzmann / Katy McReynolds vs Ai-Jiuan Wu / Lizzy Burch0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMeghan Blake / Angela Boone vs Erin Flanagan / Anne Sherman4-6, 5-7
2025-09-13vs JScaglione-TOCHLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Schmitz / Katy McReynolds vs Onyi Dillibe / Cecilia Gonzales6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAngela Boone / CJ Dearinger vs Jamie Scaglione / Areli Grodski4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStephanie Bailey / Lindsay Powell vs SusanLee Caruso / Johannah Maynor3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-06vs LBonzani-DURWon 10
W#3 DoublesMeghan Blake / Lindsay Powell vs Lilie Bonzani / Christine Kruse6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-23vs DCiresa-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnn Laros / Liza Terll vs Kristen Anderson / Eileen Reynolds6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJudith Mapstone / Julie Roland vs Xian Zhang / Dina Ciresa5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMeghan Blake / Angela Boone vs Jane Stewart / Katherine Zeph6-0, 6-2
2025-08-16vs DBaker40-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesDelisa Ordronneau / Liza Terll vs Yolanda Deaver / Pamela Howell-Davis6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori Salzmann / Martha Pearson vs Kellianne White / Kristi Brubaker2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMeghan Blake / Julie Roland vs Gretchen LoFrese / Vickie Gibbs4-6, 4-6
2025-08-09vs MGriffiths-CHTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Laros / Martha Pearson vs Ai-Jiuan Wu / Suzie Roth4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDelisa Ordronneau / Julie Roland vs Mary Griffiths / Sarah Morales3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCJ Dearinger / Lindsay Powell vs Chrissy King / Erin Flanagan3-6, 3-6
2025-08-03vs JScaglione-TOCHWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Bailey / Liza Terll vs Halle Amick / Onyi Dillibe6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Salzmann / Julie Roland vs Cecilia Gonzales / Johannah Maynor3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeghan Blake / Katy McReynolds vs Jamie Scaglione / Marjory Moreau6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Lauren Kulp
published 3.5
2.97
Ann Laros
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Liza Terll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Delisa Ordronneau
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Meghan Blake
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Lori Salzmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Karen Schmitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Katy McReynolds
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.10
Julie Roland
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.10
Lindsay Powell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Judith Mapstone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
CJ Dearinger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Delisa Ordronneau + Meghan Blake6262% games−0.3% vs expected
Ann Laros + Liza Terll9754% games−0.5% vs expected
Lori Salzmann + Katy McReynolds0533% gamesnot enough data
Delisa Ordronneau + Liza Terll314 matchesnot enough data
Delisa Ordronneau + Katy McReynolds314 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Kulp + Ann Laros213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Schmitz + Liza Terll123 matchesnot enough data
Meghan Blake + Liza Terll213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lauren Kulp
86W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
3
Ann Laros
47W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Liza Terll
76W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Delisa Ordronneau
31W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Meghan Blake
16W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Lori Salzmann
15W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Karen Schmitz
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
2.5
Katy McReynolds
22W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Julie Roland
7W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Lindsay Powell
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Judith Mapstone
0W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
CJ Dearinger
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.