Teams

KY/LOU/ZINSER/BARGER

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER 2.5 Women 2nd Session LOUISVIL · 2.5 Women Second Session 18 and Over

19 players · average NTRP 2.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-30vs KY/LOU/ULANOWSKIWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Scarpellini / Brittany Thompson vs Sydney Grace-mudd / Nichole Martin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKari Soper vs Kaylyn Budd1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAllison Marquess / Courtney Morgan vs victoria Lyalin / Olga Soukhanova6-3, 6-0
2026-05-24vs KY/LOU/OERTHERWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristina Quigley / LINDSEY INGRAM vs Deanna Roberts / Gloria Bertrand6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLeslie Pike vs Yana Feygin6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKelly Ritchie / Courtney Morgan vs Tammie Barrett / Olivia Wang1-6, 3-6
2026-05-16vs KY/LOU/EITELWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Byrne / LINDSEY INGRAM vs Allison Eitel / Heather Rueff6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKristina Quigley vs Ali Glotzbach6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrittany Thompson / Laura Yeoman vs Idil Ozkan / Jessie Thatcher3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-10vs KY/LOU/SCARBROUGH/LAMPTONLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrittany Musick / Lisa Radcliff vs Kelly Nixon / Brooke Lampton6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMeghan Roppel Weaver vs Delgertsetseg Batsaikhan1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Huelsman / Mary Scarpellini vs Amy Taylor / Kathy Bowles-Nesmith4-6, 2-6
2026-04-25vs KY/LOU/LINK/MCCALLWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllison Marquess / Kari Soper vs Megan Mcguire / Megan Imel6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJennifer Huelsman vs Kelley Leopold6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrittany Musick / Meghan Roppel Weaver vs Kellie Denton / Kirisha Golightly6-2, 6-2
2026-04-19vs KY/LOU/IVES/REDENBAUGHWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Scarpellini / Lisa Radcliff vs Amanda Scharf / Ashley Redenbaugh6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMeghan Roppel Weaver vs Simran Brar6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Huelsman / Catie Nelson vs Becky Duncan / Jennifer Nichter3-6, 5-7
2026-04-12vs KY/LOU/ULANOWSKIWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolly Barger / Leslie Pike vs Julie Koch / Sydney Grace-mudd6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesBrittany Musick vs Camira Warren3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMeghan Roppel Weaver / Amber Netter vs Olga Soukhanova / victoria Lyalin6-2, 6-1
2026-03-28vs KY/LOU/OERTHERWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaura Yeoman / LAURA CRAHAN vs Laci Pauley / Michelle Sauer1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBrittany Musick vs Tammie Barrett7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAllison Marquess / Brittany Thompson vs Deanna Roberts / Valerie Baute6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-22vs KY/LOU/EITELWon 21
L#1 DoublesMegan Zinser / Mary Scarpellini vs Georgia Hall / Idil Ozkan3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesHolly Barger vs Elena Rohr6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Radcliff / Brittany Musick vs Jessie Thatcher / Angela Sanders6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Second Session 18 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.17 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.52
Brittany Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.50
Kristina Quigley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.38
Leslie Pike
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.32
Meghan Roppel Weaver
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Amber Netter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Courtney Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Lisa Radcliff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.23
Allison Marquess
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.22
Jill Byrne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.18
Brittany Musick
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.14
Kari Soper
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.13
Holly Barger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.11
Jennifer Huelsman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.10
Mary Scarpellini
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.00
Laura Yeoman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.95
Catie Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.90
LINDSEY INGRAM
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.82
LAURA CRAHAN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Zinser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Byrne + LINDSEY INGRAM4447% games+8.6% vs expected
Laura Yeoman + LAURA CRAHAN1634% games−9.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Brittany Thompson
4W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%44%56%
2.52
Kristina Quigley
24W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
Leslie Pike
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.38
Meghan Roppel Weaver
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
Amber Netter
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Courtney Morgan
2W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Radcliff
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Allison Marquess
3W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Jill Byrne
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Brittany Musick
5W–8L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Kari Soper
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Holly Barger
13W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Jennifer Huelsman
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Mary Scarpellini
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Laura Yeoman
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Catie Nelson
1W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
LINDSEY INGRAM
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
LAURA CRAHAN
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Megan Zinser
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.