Teams

Qualification team

Adult 18 & Over WNC USTA 2025 · 18 & O 5.0 Men Monday evening

7 players · average NTRP 4.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-24vs WNCC Still (HRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesThomas Kimball / David Hartsock vs William Bayliss / Cre Still5-8
L#1 SinglesJoshua Vandegrift vs Kartik Parhar0-3
2025-05-24vs WNCC Still (HRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesThomas Kimball / Branson Smith vs Kartik Parhar / Cre Still2-8
L#1 SinglesHayden Leblanc vs Mark Piro2-8
2025-05-18vs WNCC Still (HRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesCalvin Sullivan / David Hartsock vs Mark Piro / William Bayliss5-8
W#1 SinglesJulian Stolevski vs Jean-Claude Dallies3-3
2025-05-18vs WNCC Still (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesThomas Kimball / Charles Lee vs Cre Still / William Bayliss5-8
L#1 SinglesJulian Stolevski vs Taylor Leiby2-8
L#2 DoublesDavid Hartsock / Calvin Sullivan vs Jean-Claude Dallies / Kartik Parhar6-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & O 5.0 Men Monday evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.90
Calvin Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.56
Branson Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.44
Joshua Vandegrift
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.35
Julian Stolevski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.35
Hayden Leblanc
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.22
David Hartsock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Thomas Kimball
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hayden Leblanc + Julian Stolevski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Calvin Sullivan
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.90
5
Branson Smith
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.56
Joshua Vandegrift
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
68%32%<1%
4.44
Julian Stolevski
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
4.35
5
Hayden Leblanc
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
88%12%<1%
4.35
4.5
David Hartsock
18W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.22
Thomas Kimball
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.