Teams

KHolt-HS

2025 Eno River Mixed 40 & Over · 40 & Over Mixed 3.0 Evening

13 players · average NTRP 2.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-24vs YDeaver-ENOWon 21
W#1 DoublesDirk Kumashiro / Carin von Kahr vs Jennifer Magee / FJ Magee6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Rexrode / Katie Helms vs Yolanda Deaver / David Hilsabeck4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJamie Chang / Kathy Holt vs Amanuel Haile / Tammy Hood6-4, 6-1
2025-07-16vs ROakley-EVLost 03
L#1 DoublesNathan Andrews / Kathy Holt vs Chris Reeves / Thuy Brooks3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Rexrode / Kara Andrews vs Evan Travis / Kelly Travis1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Naden / Linda Naden vs Reggie Oakley / Dawn Walker2-6, 3-6
2025-07-02vs SGraff-ENOLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarin von Kahr / Stephen Mills vs Kinsey Wennerstrom / Tom Luben1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Naden / Nathan Andrews vs Abigail Weaver / Terrence Hawkins1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Naden / Kara Andrews vs Keith Buckel / Leslie Jackson2-6, 1-6
2025-06-25vs YDeaver-ENOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDesiree Korelich / Dirk Kumashiro vs Ann Laros / Amanuel Haile4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Provost / David Naden vs Courtney Carey / David Hilsabeck2-6, 0-6
2025-06-18vs DNagelhout-HSLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephen Mills / Kathy Holt vs Dave Thomas / Tracy Stefan7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDirk Kumashiro / Katie Helms vs Jeff Denhard / Altagracia Evert1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJamie Chang / Carin von Kahr vs DAVID DELINSKY / Linda Nagelhout6-4, 6-4
2025-06-11vs AWu-ENOLost 03
L#1 DoublesThomas Rexrode / Melissa Provost vs Bill Stewart / Rebecca Kelada0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNathan Andrews / Kara Andrews vs CHARLES ENDERLINE / Elizabeth Enderline4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHayes Hofler / Linda Naden vs Conan Shearer / Ai-Jiuan Wu0-6, 2-6
2025-06-04vs JYoung-ENOWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Holt / Dirk Kumashiro vs Pamela Howell-Davis / Will Gresham6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Rexrode / Katie Helms vs Liz Schaller / Bill Schaller3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Naden / Jamie Chang vs Susan Parent / Chris Petree6-1, 6-2
2025-05-28vs AHabib-HRLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Mills / Kara Andrews vs James Bowers / Kim Cabelka3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKatie Helms / Hayes Hofler vs Barbie McGarrah / Rob McGarrah3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNathan Andrews / Desiree Korelich vs Cheryl Bock / Michael Klein2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 40 & Over Mixed 3.0 Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SGraff-ENO7117716154
2AWu-ENO43111021161
3YDeaver-ENO35101431223
4KHolt-HS2661839252
5JYoung-ENO0731839243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Stephen Mills
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Nathan Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Dirk Kumashiro
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Carin von Kahr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Melissa Provost
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Hayes Hofler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Katie Helms
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Desiree Korelich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.49
Kathy Holt
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Kara Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.25
Linda Naden
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.17
David Naden
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Thomas Rexrode
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kara Andrews + Nathan Andrews033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Mills
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Nathan Andrews
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Dirk Kumashiro
41W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Carin von Kahr
43W–63L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Melissa Provost
9W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Hayes Hofler
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Katie Helms
11W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.66
2.5
Desiree Korelich
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%40%60%
2.53
3
Kathy Holt
25W–63L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
3
Kara Andrews
8W–52L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Linda Naden
4W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.25
2.5
David Naden
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Thomas Rexrode
0W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.