Teams

LTFCS PLUMMER

2024 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME - SOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-20vs CSRC VANEVERYLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Moore / Laura Schafer vs Jane Corral / Sara Scroggins6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTerri Plummer / Nida Colao vs Vikki ONeil / Julia Hershey6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-13vs CCW WOLFELost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Schafer / Susan Moore vs Catherine McWhorter / Tawny Vollrath6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTerri Plummer / Charlie Bishop vs CLAUDIA GRAVER / Shara Wolfe5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Scruggs / Carmen Ekblad vs Emily Butler / Kele Hauke2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-06vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Schafer / Susan Moore vs Rachel Rocks / Ann Grumann6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Plummer / Tracy Boone vs Cindy Yetter / Susan Hilton1-6, 0-6
2024-05-30vs MEMPK BEUTELSCHIESWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarmen Ekblad / Tracy Boone vs Bonnie Iten / Kristen Lowery5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-23vs CCOC MAYLESLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarmen Ekblad / Deborah Scruggs vs Kristina Bodoczky / Elizabeth Kelly4-6, 2-6
2024-05-16vs CSRC VANEVERYLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Schafer / Deborah Scruggs vs Jane Corral / Sara Scroggins3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarmen Ekblad / Karen Henderson vs Dawn Conley / Lori McPherson3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCharlie Bishop / Terri Plummer vs Julia Hershey / Vincenta van Every4-6, 2-6
2024-05-09vs CCW WOLFEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Moore / Laura Schafer vs Sara Michon / Shara Wolfe6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCharlie Bishop / Terri Plummer vs April Falk / Renee Crisler0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNida Colao / Carmen Ekblad vs Erin Contreras / Kele Hauke3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charlie Bishop
published 4
3.63
Laura Schafer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Deborah Scruggs
published 4
3.39
Carmen Ekblad
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.38
Terri Plummer
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Tracy Boone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Plummer + Charlie Bishop3441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlie Bishop
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Laura Schafer
13W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Deborah Scruggs
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Carmen Ekblad
81W–72L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Terri Plummer
57W–80L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Tracy Boone
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.