Teams

CBRC-Newsom

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-05-29vs WRAC-GoetschLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarole Kupsh / Sidney Newsom vs Donna Parsons / Kellie Goetsch3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Lipton / Lory Allen vs Maureen Woodward / Debra Miller2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Miles / Huijuan Zhang vs Jennifer Carlson / Darillyn Flones3-6, 4-6
2021-05-29vs IND-Peak NorthwestLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Miles / Huijuan Zhang vs Sherry Varner / Terri Ruthruff1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Burton / Nancy Lauck vs Laura Temby / Kathleen Maple3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLory Allen / Mary Lipton vs Janie Slater / Lisa Marks3-6, 2-6
2021-05-28vs IND-Peak NorthwestLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Lauck / Carole Kupsh vs Patti Marvel / Karen Henderson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Burton / Sidney Newsom vs Laura Temby / Sherry Varner1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHuijuan Zhang / Lory Allen vs Janie Slater / Lisa Marks2-6, 1-6
2021-05-28vs WRAC-GoetschLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarole Kupsh / Sidney Newsom vs Kelley Quinn / Darillyn Flones0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJeannie Friehauf / Nancy Lauck vs Elizabeth Linnell / Jennifer Carlson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 7.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IND-Peak Northwest40120373
2SC-Middle Skittles3081562
3PC-Koehler21541078
4WRAC-Goetsch22661397
5YTC-Donahue12361271
6GAC-Gorge Athletic032715104
7CBRC-Newsom0401224142

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Sidney Newsom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Huijuan Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Lory Allen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Carole Kupsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeannie Friehauf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Miles
published
Mary Lipton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Lauck
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carole Kupsh + Sidney Newsom134 matchesnot enough data
Lory Allen + Huijuan Zhang134 matchesnot enough data
Sidney Newsom + Mary Lipton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sidney Newsom
56W–57L career · 3 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Huijuan Zhang
20W–27L career · type M · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Lory Allen
23W–65L career · 3 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
2.49
Carole Kupsh
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeannie Friehauf
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Linda Miles
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Lipton
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Lauck
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.