Teams

Happy Feet

2023 Adult 55 and Over League · 8.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-28vs MCC ForceLost 03
L#1 DoublesSharon Heintzman / Rosalie Holland vs Juliana Massenburg / Caroline Gammie1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Ho / Carole Anderson vs Jackie DeCrinis / Abbie Murray3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlice Koniges / Leslie Wilshusen vs Jeanne Dunn / Bettina Haerer6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-05-13vs Baby BoomersLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Ho / Leslie Wilshusen vs Rita Ingstad / Janet King3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Chaves / Alice Koniges vs Deborah Sawyer / Jill Kanahele0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesM Beverly Rivers / Michelle DeFilippi vs Cynthia Funai / Debbie Montgomery1-6, 3-6
2023-05-07vs MCC ForceLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelanie Brown / Leslie Wilshusen vs Jennifer Goldyn / Karen Sullivan3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarole Anderson / Joyce Colleen vs Caroline Gammie / Jackie DeCrinis1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesM Beverly Rivers / Michelle DeFilippi vs Tana Leander / Juliana Massenburg1-6, 5-7
2023-05-06vs Baby BoomersLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarole Anderson / Joyce Colleen vs Jill Kanahele / Janet King3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRosalie Holland / Sharon Heintzman vs Debbie Montgomery / Cynthia Funai0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Chaves / Leslie Wilshusen vs Lory Kaufman / Deanna DiBiase1-6, 3-6
2023-04-23vs Baby BoomersWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarole Anderson / Janie Hansen vs Ligaya Acob-Powell / Rowena Nikki Baysa6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristine Ho / Leslie Wilshusen vs Petra Dupont / Lore Lee Robello6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelanie Brown / Ruza Pocivavsek vs Deanna DiBiase / Lory Kaufman0-6, 1-6
2023-04-16vs MCC ForceLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoyce Colleen / Melanie Brown vs Caroline Gammie / Juliana Massenburg5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJanie Hansen / Ruza Pocivavsek vs Catherine Hall / Karen Sullivan5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesM Beverly Rivers / Rosalie Holland vs Sharon Dahlquist / Abbie Murray3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Debra Orton
published 4
3.38
M Beverly Rivers
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.36
Diane Chaves
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Leslie Wilshusen
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.10
Ruza Pocivavsek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Alice Koniges
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Christine Ho
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Carole Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Janie Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Joyce Colleen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle DeFilippi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rosalie Holland
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sharon Heintzman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

M Beverly Rivers + Michelle DeFilippi16757% games+6.1% vs expected
Leslie Wilshusen + Diane Chaves3346% games−0.2% vs expected
Leslie Wilshusen + M Beverly Rivers101048% games−1.3% vs expected
Leslie Wilshusen + Christine Ho21036% games−5.4% vs expected
Sharon Heintzman + Rosalie Holland1927% gamesnot enough data
M Beverly Rivers + Diane Chaves7165% gamesnot enough data
Ruza Pocivavsek + Leslie Wilshusen224 matchesnot enough data
M Beverly Rivers + Alice Koniges224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debra Orton
5W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
M Beverly Rivers
112W–81L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Diane Chaves
116W–106L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Leslie Wilshusen
46W–91L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Ruza Pocivavsek
7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Alice Koniges
14W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Christine Ho
13W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.99
Carole Anderson
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Janie Hansen
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joyce Colleen
23W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle DeFilippi
23W–23L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rosalie Holland
6W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Heintzman
10W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.