Teams

BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 18AM4.5A

2026 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.5

31 players · average NTRP 4.30 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-13vs EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE 18AM4.5AWon 10
W#2 SinglesPatrick Friscia vs Tim Chew4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-04vs SAN CARLOS TC/CARLMONT HS 18AM4.5ASplit 11
L#1 SinglesPatrick Friscia vs Anand Sundararajan6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulian Nguyen / Benjamin Yan vs Arunangshu Chakrabarty / Maikel Garcia Despaigne6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJohn Mccann vs Athul Ganesh6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAngus Wong / Sander Zaydman vs David Zeng / Ping Yu6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-28vs SAN CARLOS TC/CARLMONT HS 18AM4.5ALost 01
L#1 SinglesSander Zaydman vs Athul Ganesh1-6, 1-6
2026-05-24vs LOS GATOS SR 18AM4.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatrick Friscia / Carlos Basto vs Raghava Chari / Gabriele Dipiazza6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAleksei Metalnikov vs Joey Wang3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSpencer Moss / Lucad Ochsendorf Pacheco vs Andrew Huang / Abhishek Nishis3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesPatrick Friscia vs Slava Moudryi6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoel Lee / Julian Nguyen vs Eric Jue / Steven Madrinan6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAleksei Metalnikov vs John Lee6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLucad Ochsendorf Pacheco / Angus Wong vs Motilal Agrawal / Richard Chang2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJohn Mccann vs Maikel Garcia Despaigne6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesPatrick Friscia / Alex Zhou vs Chris Bernt / Dan Nandra2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings68 teams · Men's 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FOLSOM LAKE CC 18AM4.5A10042822313
2FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 18AM4.5A100391132363
3WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM4.5A9142820293
4WASHINGTON PK 18AM4.5A91391129293
5LAFAYETTE TC 18AM4.5A91371330317
6ALMADEN SR 18AM4.5A91361433374
7PINEWOOD PK 18AM4.5A91381234373
8SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM4.5B91361437399
9GOLD RIVER RC 18AM4.5C82391128340
10BAY TREES PK 18AM4.5A82381229355
11RINCONADA PK 18AM4.5B82351539396
12SAN RAMON VALLEY HS 18AM4.5A82331740378
13WASHOE TENNIS CLUB/WASHOE TC 18AM4.5A82331740380
14GOLDMAN TC 18AM4.5A82321840406
15SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM4.5A82262456454
16RIO DEL ORO 18AM4.5A73341638372
17BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM4.5A73341640371
18RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 18AM4.5A73331741364
19FLYTE RC 18AM4.5A73311945423
20GOLDMAN TC 18AM4.5C73321846415
21ROHNERT PK TC/MAGNOLIA/M PK 18AM4.5A73311947432
22MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 18AM4.5A73252558451
23PLEASANTON 18AM4.5A64311947410
24SAN FRAN ST U 18AM4.5A64302047413
25MILL VALLEY 18AM4.5A64272354430
26MILLS COLLEGE 18AM4.5A64242657429
27BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 18AM4.5A64252558447
28BROOKSIDE 18AM4.5A64262459418
29WASHINGTON PK 18AM4.5B55292147376
30BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 18AM4.5A55292151435
31RIDGEMARK G&CC 18AM4.5A55262452416
32GOLDMAN TC 18AM4.5B55262453426
33BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AM4.5B55252555431
34WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM4.5B55262456443
35SAN PABLO PK 18AM4.5A55242657439
36CHAMISAL TC 18AM4.5A55252557431
37LA MADRONA SR 18AM4.5A55242658462
38FREMONT TC 18AM4.5B55212962428
39RENO TENNIS CENTER 18AM4.5A55232763501
40DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS 18AM4.5A55232766494
41CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS EAST HS 18AM4.5A44202045367
42CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.5A44202047363
43MILLBRAE RC 18AM4.5A46272353432
44BACKESTO PK 18AM4.5A46203068468
45RINCONADA PK 18AM4.5A37232762495
46YELLOWSTONE 18AM4.5A37203063481
47MERVYN MORRIS PK 18AM4.5A37212965460
48LOS ALTOS TC/LOS ALTOS GCC 18AM4.5A37203067485
49BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AM4.5A37183268485
50UNION CITY LEISURE S/VETERANS MEM PK 18AM4.5A37193169480
51MARIN TC 18AM4.5A37173370493
52GOLD RIVER RC 18AM4.5A37173371525
53ROSEVILLE LIFE TIME 18AM4.5A37163473531
54LOS GATOS SR 18AM4.5A37173375536
55GOLD RIVER RC 18AM4.5B37133777503
56ROLLING HILLS 18AM4.5A28193168502
57CUESTA TC 18AM4.5A28173371520
58CAUGHLIN 18AM4.5A28193171491
59SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM4.5C28163474512
60WILLOW PASS PK 18AM4.5A18113473486
61CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 18AM4.5A19193167449
62EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE 18AM4.5A19133774514
63JOHNSON RANCH 18AM4.5A19143679524
64OLYMPIC 18AM4.5A19123883547
65ROUND HILL CC 18AM4.5A0944184514
66FREMONT TC 18AM4.5A010104083552
67SAN CARLOS TC/CARLMONT HS 18AM4.5A01094186558
68DAVIE STADIUM 18AM4.5A01054591571

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 27 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Justin Lu
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.34
Aneil Kamboj
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.33
Giacomo Balli
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
4.28
Brett Markowitz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.26
Michael Franchi
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Ali Jafri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Christopher Ruiz Chiu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Taylor T Leese
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.19
Patrick Friscia
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.16
Rob Lamour
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
John Mccann
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
4.14
Benjamin Yan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.11
Ruhan Prasad
usually #1 Singles 70%, also #2 Singles 30% · published
4.04
Shahand Esmaeili
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
4.04
Andrew Davey
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.04
Henry Shea
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.00
Aleksei Metalnikov
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.98
Kyle Mosier
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.92
Dennis Duan
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 4
3.91
Christopher Sycamore
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Rohith Pottabathni
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
3.85
Spencer Moss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Kelemen Papp
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.78
Julian Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.78
Lucad Ochsendorf Pacheco
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.69
Sander Zaydman
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
William Sanders
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.64
Angus Wong
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.51
William Niessner
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Eugene Hooi
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Jonathan Ng
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis Duan + Christopher Sycamore224 matchesnot enough data
William Niessner + Christopher Sycamore303 matchesnot enough data
Rohith Pottabathni + Brett Markowitz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Lu
24W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
4.41
4.5
Aneil Kamboj
11W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
4.34
Giacomo Balli
8W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Brett Markowitz
7W–6L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
Michael Franchi
7W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Ali Jafri
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Christopher Ruiz Chiu
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Taylor T Leese
10W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Patrick Friscia
9W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Rob Lamour
12W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
John Mccann
6W–0L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
4.14
4.5
Benjamin Yan
6W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.14
Ruhan Prasad
6W–4L career · 10 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.11
Shahand Esmaeili
6W–6L career · 11 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
4.04
4.5
Andrew Davey
15W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
4.04
Henry Shea
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Aleksei Metalnikov
6W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00
Kyle Mosier
7W–1L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Dennis Duan
7W–2L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.92
4
Christopher Sycamore
15W–7L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
Rohith Pottabathni
3W–6L career · 9 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.86
Spencer Moss
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Kelemen Papp
8W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
Julian Nguyen
14W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Lucad Ochsendorf Pacheco
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Sander Zaydman
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
William Sanders
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.67
4
Angus Wong
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.64
William Niessner
7W–4L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Eugene Hooi
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jonathan Ng
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.