Teams

Alvarez/Robbins

2025 Lubbock Adult Mixed League 40 & Over · 8.0 Adult Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-21vs CookWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Vasquez / Jennifer Moore vs Mark Smith / Lindsey Craig3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephen Dalton / Brianna Guerra vs Mark Weaver / Renee Cook3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRandy Robbins / Angela Trevithick vs Shaunna Jensen / Patrick Sturdivant6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-21vs CookSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Vasquez / Brianna Guerra vs Michael Flores / Lisa MacK5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAngela Trevithick / Keith Dixon vs Lindsey Craig / Mark Weaver6-4, 6-2
2025-06-12vs CookSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStephen Dalton / Jennifer Moore vs Trevas Cruz / Amy Boren6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesElvira Cruz / Joe Welborn vs Lindsey Craig / Rocco Testini1-6, 0-6
2025-06-05vs CookSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Moore / Keith Dixon vs Paulette Sturdivant / Patrick Sturdivant4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoe Welborn / Elvira Cruz vs Mark Smith / Renee Cook4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-31vs CookSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAngela Trevithick / Randy Robbins vs Michael Flores / Lisa MacK4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAmy Gandy / Joe Welborn vs Ginger Wayland / Rocco Testini6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Stephen Dalton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Amy Gandy
published 4
3.69
Angela Trevithick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.67
Brianna Guerra
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Keith Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Randy Robbins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Elvira Cruz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Holly Robbins
published
Joe Alvarez
published
Joe Welborn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
John Vasquez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Dalton
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Amy Gandy
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Angela Trevithick
41W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.69
4
Brianna Guerra
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
Keith Dixon
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Randy Robbins
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
Elvira Cruz
45W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Holly Robbins
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joe Alvarez
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joe Welborn
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Vasquez
31W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.