Teams

The Vicious Vollies

2025 Anne Arundel Mixed 40 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 40 & Over 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-12vs ThomassonLost 01
L#1 DoublesFelicia Harrison / Matthew Ganney vs Jennifer Floyd / Jeff Brainard5-7, 5-7
2025-07-06vs WagnerLost 01
L#3 DoublesShelena Sanderson / Matthew Ganney vs Joanne Connelly / Justin Wagner3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-30vs ThomassonLost 01
L#2 DoublesFelicia Harrison / Ron Best vs Jennifer Floyd / Jeff Brainard6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 40 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dejuan Mcilwain
published 4.5
4.13
Shelena Sanderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
Felicia Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Jamaine Chisholm
published
3.81
Mark Chisholm
published
3.78
Denise Freeman
published 4
3.77
Renee Campbell
published
3.72
Walter Winston
published
3.47
James Lincoln
published
3.40
Beth Turner
published 3.5
3.35
Marcus Moore
published
3.34
Ron Best
published
3.09
Matthew Ganney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Larry Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Campbell + Larry Johnson213 matchesnot enough data
Renee Campbell + Ron Best123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dejuan Mcilwain
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Shelena Sanderson
199W–141L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
4
Felicia Harrison
87W–105L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Jamaine Chisholm
22W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Mark Chisholm
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Denise Freeman
26W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Renee Campbell
13W–23L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Walter Winston
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
James Lincoln
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Beth Turner
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Marcus Moore
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.35
Ron Best
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Matthew Ganney
61W–156L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Larry Johnson
23W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.