Teams

Niggebrugge/Perez

2026 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 4.0 Men 18 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-28vs WeddleWon 21
L#1 SinglesGuilherme Perez vs Robert Weins4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJordan Niggebrugge vs Matej Polomsky6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMike O'Beirne vs Elijah Warren6-1, 6-1
2026-02-23vs CarrollWon 21
L#1 SinglesIbardo Zambrano vs Andrew Gillespie4-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJordan Niggebrugge vs Zachary Manfredi6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesLaurence Nadeau vs John Chapman6-1, 6-4
2026-02-18vs Basta/Janik CFCCWon 30
W#1 SinglesGuilherme Perez vs Tim Rahauser6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMike O'Beirne vs Johannes Haasbroek6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJordan Niggebrugge vs Matthew Janik6-2, 7-5
2026-02-10vs WeddleSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLaurence Nadeau vs Robert Weins3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesGuilherme Perez vs Matej Polomsky6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJordan Niggebrugge vs Matthew Colonna6-0, 7-5
W#2 SinglesGuilherme Perez vs Corey Kershaw6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMike O'Beirne vs Alex Armeni6-1, 6-2
2026-01-26vs Basta/Janik CFCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesSamuel Durham vs Nick Basta6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLaurence Nadeau vs Chris Hoenig6-1, 6-2
2026-01-21vs CarrollWon 21
W#1 SinglesGuilherme Perez vs Corbin Carroll6-3, 1-1
L#2 SinglesJordan Niggebrugge vs Andrew Gillespie6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMike O'Beirne vs Zachary Manfredi6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMike O'Beirne vs Alex Armeni5-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesJordan Niggebrugge vs Matthew Conzola6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0 Men 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Niggebrugge/Perez6217715148
2McCabe/Martorelli/Matthews 18+ Singles44101432248
3Carroll35121226202
4Basta/Janik CFCC2671737255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Jordan Niggebrugge
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
4.00
Mike O'Beirne
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
4.00
Ibardo Zambrano
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.89
Guilherme Perez
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.82
Laurence Nadeau
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Samuel Durham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Niggebrugge + Guilherme Perez14559% games+3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jordan Niggebrugge
203W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
4.10
Mike O'Beirne
44W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Ibardo Zambrano
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Guilherme Perez
203W–73L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Laurence Nadeau
21W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Samuel Durham
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.