Teams

Jo.Williamson18S

2024 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-09vs Ro.Harris18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesAlessandro Montanari vs PEDRO J LEON4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesChad Cox vs Robert Harris2-6, 3-6
2024-10-02vs Br.Kohan18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesChad Cox vs Stephen Mungenast0-6, 0-6
2024-08-28vs Jo.Hastings18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesAlessandro Montanari vs William Slocum6-7, 0-6
2024-08-21vs Ro.Harris18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesAlessandro Montanari vs PEDRO J LEON5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-08-14vs Br.Kohan18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesChad Cox vs Jody Anderson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Joseph Williamson
published
2.98
Alessandro Montanari
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.84
Nishant Nayudu
published
2.79
Ian Villanueva
published 3
2.63
Peter Flack
published
2.50
Chad Cox
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.41
Elliott Blades
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alessandro Montanari + Joseph Williamson5061% games+7.4% vs expected
Peter Flack + Joseph Williamson3254% games+2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Williamson
28W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.10
3
Alessandro Montanari
102W–90L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.98
Nishant Nayudu
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Ian Villanueva
4W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
Peter Flack
11W–27L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
2.63
3
Chad Cox
31W–73L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
2.50
2.5
Elliott Blades
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%76%24%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.