Teams

SPTC Hot Shots

2022 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 W Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-20vs Seminole Lake CokeWon 10
W#1 DoublesAva Leischen / Kenzier McIntyre vs Cathrine Chin / Renee DiVincent7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-19vs Seminole Lake CokeWon 20
W#1 DoublesShelly Watkins / Karen LaRocca vs Cathrine Chin / Karen Miller6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKenzier McIntyre / Belkis Dulberg vs Esthela Gonzalez / Nympha Sison7-6, 7-5
2022-03-05vs Seminole Lake Smash GirlsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren LaRocca / Breezy Paulus vs JoAnn Lind / Kristen Pierce1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBelkis Dulberg / Kenzier McIntyre vs Tracy Bickel / Frances Parker6-3, 6-3
2022-02-26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKenzier McIntyre / Belkis Dulberg vs Cindy Kobeda / Cindy Ferguson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-02-12vs Pinellas - Bardmoor/GrossWon 10
W#2 DoublesKenzier McIntyre / Ava Leischen vs Danielle Haggar / Victoria Tuller7-5, 6-4
2022-02-05Split 11
L#1 DoublesBreezy Paulus / Christine Assefa vs Xi Mannari / Nympha Sison1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKenzier McIntyre / Ava Leischen vs Jeanne Ann Killam / Carrie Gelston6-4, 6-2
2022-01-31vs Pinellas - Bardmoor/GrossLost 01
L#2 DoublesDiane Haymes / Breezy Paulus vs Gina Morgan / Kimberly Northup4-6, 2-6
2022-01-29vs Seminole Lake Smash GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesBreezy Paulus / Kenzier McIntyre vs Harriet Cregann / Anne Remie5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Kenzier McIntyre
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.50
Shelly Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Kathleen Kenyon
published
3.29
Breezy Paulus
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Diane Haymes
published 3.5
3.21
Rachel Karioki
published
3.08
Brooke Rosenberg
published 3.5
2.78
Christine Assefa
published 3
Juliet Auer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenzier McIntyre + Breezy Paulus312553% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kenzier McIntyre
173W–119L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Shelly Watkins
72W–53L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
Kathleen Kenyon
43W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Breezy Paulus
61W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Diane Haymes
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Rachel Karioki
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Brooke Rosenberg
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Christine Assefa
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Juliet Auer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.