Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.32 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesKay Taylor / Sandra Zane vs Elizabeth Hall / Danette Stein6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Le / Michaela Nazareno vs Sharon Spangler / Ashley Parker6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesAli Laventhol / Rebecca Berman vs Marie Roco / Michelle Fowler6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathleen Gyllenhaal / Leslie Le vs Lisa Yu / Kathleen Janisch4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKay Taylor / Sandra Zane vs Hae Oh / Julia Arnold3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKathleen Gyllenhaal / Ali Laventhol vs Anita Tang / Milou Lee4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJill Jobran / Michaela Nazareno vs Sarah Kloepfer / Terry Meng3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJill Jobran / Monica Anderson vs Nancy Pashayan / Tina Nili-Black6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNancy Ray / Kathleen Gyllenhaal vs Pamela Girard / Antoinette Lessuk4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichaela Nazareno / Alice Markowski vs Alison Shore / Nadine Ono6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-23vs SGV Sugar and Slice-Nix-ATCC/SA2Won 20
W#2 DoublesNancy Ray / Ali Laventhol vs Carolyn Altman / Elizabeth Wilson6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMay Low / Kay Taylor vs Linda Brandley / Claire Jarashow6-2, 6-1
2025-11-09vs SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SA4Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLeslie Le / Michaela Nazareno vs Kio Novina / Jennifer Williams4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGINA SKIBAR / Sophia Chang vs Eileen Yip / CARA Yokomizo3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSandra Zane / Pat Guttormsen vs Linh Preston / Sachiko Kawai6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-11-02vs SGV FLoBS-Galvagni-Scholl CYN/SU4Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Jobran / Leslie Le vs Lesley Nishigawara / Karen Kice5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Zane / Michaela Nazareno vs Jennifer Giancola / Stefani Galvagni6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Berman / Ali Laventhol vs Kat Kim / Sophie Kweskin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Berman / Christine Whigham vs Sandy Mandel / Seema Calip4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Ray / Jill Jobran vs Christiana Liu / Larissa Tan6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesJill Jobran / Monica Anderson vs Tracy Lee / Hitomi Kawasaki6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Berman / Christine Whigham vs Jasmine M Liu / Veronica Saucedo6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Le / Michaela Nazareno vs Regina Gov / Quynh Nghiem4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaribeth F Rodriguez / GINA SKIBAR vs Anne Neal / Shaheen Plunier0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Monica Anderson
published
3.59
Jill Jobran
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.48
Nancy Ray
published
3.42
Kathleen Gyllenhaal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Jo Ann Thrailkill
published
3.33
Michaela Nazareno
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.25
Rebecca Berman
published
3.23
Christine Whigham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Ali Laventhol
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Leslie Le
published
3.10
GINA SKIBAR
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Pat Guttormsen
published
3.04
Sandra Zane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
May Low
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Alice Markowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
2.89
Maribeth F Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Sophia Chang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sophia Chang + May Low2451% games+3.0% vs expected
Ali Laventhol + Christine Whigham372154% games−1.5% vs expected
Maribeth F Rodriguez + Jill Jobran303 matchesnot enough data
GINA SKIBAR + Jill Jobran213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monica Anderson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Jill Jobran
172W–46L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Nancy Ray
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Kathleen Gyllenhaal
68W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jo Ann Thrailkill
34W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Michaela Nazareno
15W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Rebecca Berman
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Christine Whigham
132W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Ali Laventhol
163W–119L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Leslie Le
22W–38L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
GINA SKIBAR
114W–80L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.10
Pat Guttormsen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Sandra Zane
146W–141L career · 4 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
May Low
28W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Alice Markowski
70W–69L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Christine Pedroza
39W–40L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Maribeth F Rodriguez
164W–169L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.89
Sophia Chang
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.