Teams

Yadkin/FCC-OT/18+7.5

2026 Yadkin Valley Combo 18 & Over · Men 7.5 - Wednesday Nights

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesDavid Kaszycki / Robert Harris vs Max Sandberg / James Richards3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCJ Hines / Patrick McGowan vs Matthew Wright / Joseph Kulits3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDixon Douglas / Jacob Watts vs Will Jordan-Leonard / Andrew Backus0-6, 1-6
2026-08-19vs Yadkin/Whitman/18+7.5 ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Hennessee / Andrew Darcy vs Barrett Self / Jack Grubbs6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCJ Hines / Austin Temple vs Caio Max Rocha Lima / Matthew Whitman7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick McGowan / Dixon Douglas vs Alex George / Chad Riesett0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 - Wednesday Nights have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Kaszycki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Austin Temple
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Brent Collins
published 3.5
3.23
Chris Beechler
published 3.5
3.23
Andrew Darcy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
CJ Hines
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dixon Douglas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jacob Watts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nathan Bohon
published
Ryan Hennessee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Austin Temple + CJ Hines213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Kaszycki
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Austin Temple
15W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Brent Collins
0W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Chris Beechler
0W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Andrew Darcy
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
CJ Hines
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Dixon Douglas
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jacob Watts
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nathan Bohon
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ryan Hennessee
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.