Teams

13 Chestnut Oaks Coyle

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-05vs 10 WOCC Mullinax 3.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesMichael Coyle vs Reilly Maw1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRobert Mercurio vs Steve Campbell1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesLucas Ward vs Jim Kennedy6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-10-29vs 8 MAC We R Them - PessarraSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMichael Coyle vs Joseph Gault6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLucas Ward vs John Haggai6-3, 6-1
2025-10-22vs 5 LPC MorganLost 12
L#1 SinglesLucas Ward vs Will Gauden7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMichael Coyle vs Emmit Wright6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesMarshall Powell vs Robert Meister4-6, 3-6
2025-10-08vs 2 Hermitage AdamsWon 20
W#1 SinglesMarshall Powell vs Blair Smith6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLucas Ward vs Douglas Lines6-1, 6-3
2025-10-01vs 11 Burkwood 3.0 - ButterworthLost 12
L#1 SinglesMichael Coyle vs Andrew Hylton3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRobert Mercurio vs Adam Tuck6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesBrian Gearing vs Scott Schoenwiesner4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBrian Gearing vs Chris Gaines0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLucas Ward vs Benton Boone3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMarshall Powell vs Chris Armstrong6-1, 6-2
2025-09-21vs 9 Westwood SnyderLost 12
L#1 SinglesMarshall Powell vs Zachary Webb2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMichael Coyle vs Scott Lewis6-2, 7-5
L#3 SinglesLucas Ward vs Michael Creager4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Robert Mercurio
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.81
Lucas Ward
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Brian Gearing
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.66
Michael Coyle
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Marshall Powell
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Mercurio + Michael Coyle3348% games+4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Mercurio
28W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Lucas Ward
8W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Brian Gearing
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Coyle
23W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
Marshall Powell
3W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.