Teams

Ma.Slaymaker40A3.0

2025 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.11 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-06vs Ka.Knoblauch40AWon 20
W#1 DoublesKate Pirrung / Summer DuMont vs Mary Zimardo / Kelly Day6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCathy Werder / Lisa DeMarco vs Emy Hanson / Jaime Gaskins4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-29vs Sa.Cooke40AWon 20
W#1 SinglesMarilyn Slaymaker vs Robin Wascher6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPeggy Dobbins / Tricia Manger vs Susan Potter / Sarah Cooke6-2, 6-1
2025-04-28vs Ka.Southern40ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesCathy Werder / Summer DuMont vs Debra Hauge / Christine Panzl6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTricia Manger / Peggy Dobbins vs Karen Southern / Maureen Doherty3-6, 3-6
2025-04-22vs Ju.Liddle40ALost 03
L#1 DoublesCathy Werder / Michelle Eisenberg vs Jennifer Taylor / Linda Blevins2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Duerr / Lisa DeMarco vs Julie Karg / Tami Hollingsworth5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTricia Manger / Peggy Dobbins vs Neepa Patel / Lisa Bakowski3-6, 2-6
2025-03-25vs Sa.Highsmith40AWon 21
W#1 DoublesRebekah Mcconnell / Emma Coblentz vs Shade Maret / Amy Baker7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCathy Werder / Michelle Eisenberg vs Kristen Patch / Anna Goodmon5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPeggy Dobbins / Amanda Viele vs Kelly Burkhardt / Janna Myers3-6, 1-6
2025-03-18vs Ch.McCorquodale40AWon 30
W#1 DoublesCathy Werder / Melissa Green vs Danielle Cardona / Judy Colby6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSummer DuMont vs Maria Riemann6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarilyn Slaymaker / Emma Coblentz vs Christine Mccorquodale / Eva Frecker6-0, 6-4
2025-03-11vs Ka.Knoblauch40ALost 04
L#1 DoublesKate Pirrung / Emma Coblentz vs Mary Zimardo / Kelly Day3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJenna Wooten-Quade vs Kari Knoblauch5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarilyn Slaymaker / Summer DuMont vs Emy Hanson / Jaime Gaskins6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPeggy Dobbins / Lisa DeMarco vs Abigail Douek / Kristin Esham6-7, 1-6
2025-03-04vs Sa.Cooke40AWon 30
W#1 DoublesKate Pirrung / Emma Coblentz vs Sarah Cooke / Laura Haithcock6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPeggy Dobbins / Tricia Manger vs Courtney Britt / Jessica Jones6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarilyn Slaymaker / Michelle Eisenberg vs Lauren Daigle / Shobha Vagianos4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Kate Pirrung
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.22
Emma Coblentz
published
3.16
Summer DuMont
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Marilyn Slaymaker
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.01
Cathy Werder
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.98
Lisa DeMarco
published
2.91
Peggy Dobbins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Jenna Wooten-Quade
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.79
Michelle Eisenberg
published
2.77
Rebekah Mcconnell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Jennifer Duerr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Melissa Green
published
2.40
Amanda Viele
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Pirrung + Jennifer Duerr11755% gamesnot enough data
Marilyn Slaymaker + Summer DuMont5950% gamesnot enough data
Kate Pirrung + Cathy Werder5255% gamesnot enough data
Kate Pirrung + Marilyn Slaymaker2446% gamesnot enough data
Kate Pirrung + Summer DuMont4259% gamesnot enough data
Lisa DeMarco + Cathy Werder224 matchesnot enough data
Marilyn Slaymaker + Cathy Werder314 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Werder + Peggy Dobbins314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kate Pirrung
184W–117L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Emma Coblentz
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Summer DuMont
87W–72L career · 8 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Marilyn Slaymaker
156W–103L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Cathy Werder
92W–71L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Lisa DeMarco
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.98
3
Peggy Dobbins
53W–42L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Jenna Wooten-Quade
41W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Michelle Eisenberg
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Rebekah Mcconnell
49W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Jennifer Duerr
88W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Melissa Green
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Amanda Viele
6W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.